Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Tuesday, February 17, 2009 <br />Page 6 <br />foreclosed homes in Roseville, and what role the HRA would or could play in that related to <br />reinvestment in those properties and based on income-limited qualificarion criteria similar to <br />the current loan program, or whether the City needed to target those between low and higher <br />income levels; basing assistance on credit scores in addirion to those not having down payment <br />monies; and how renters are impacted by homeowners not making payments. <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that staff was not recommending any HRA participation this year; <br />however, opened this up for discussion and consideration for possible 2010 programming, if <br />trends continued to indicate homes were staying vacant longer, crearing other saf�� �d code <br />enforcement issues in the City. � <br />Member Elkins reviewed current loan qualifications, and upcoming gran ` s becoming <br />available soon and criteria for those grant programs. Member Elkins f er he current <br />�� <br />lottery system used for member banks in receiving grant funds. °' <br />� :.� <br />Further discussion included how to define the most appropn���le for the HRA; w� sey <br />County participation and distribution of grant funding, ,�d current information�ceived <br />through the County; assisring those missing the 80/20 se,��'rs; lac incentives in the private <br />sector, crearing a niche for communities to provide a��� nce; a uced market values for <br />real estate and their potenrial for further decline. <br />Member Pust noted the need for caurion in adhering to the' <br />to come into the community, and not facilitaring speculative <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that this was the <br />equity situations for owner-occupied <br />housing to faiiiilies <br />to consider shared <br />Further discussion included market-dri r estate ��ricing; assessment values and caps in <br />the area; use of grant monies, but not wed monies for down payments; how and when <br />local government should intervene; rights of renters in foreclosed properties; lack of language <br />in rental leases relat�„d �:f�reclosures; anc��,��iing rule changes in foreclosure legislarion. <br />Member Pust ;�bted the �"ed to detern�fine, in reviewing data on rentals for four-plexes for <br />potential li A�" ing dis ` '��,�� was rime for an ordinance in Roseville that included <br />languag �� lo tenant weren't informed of potenrial evicrion situarions <br />and/or foreclo s a way to provide incentive for open communication between parties and <br />protecting rights. � <br />�� �� it was c�termined that the City would conrinue to monitor and research ways to <br />be a reso and how those resources were brought to the awareness of those needing them; <br />with no fo ''' presentarions of additional programs until legislation is firmed up. <br />Home an arden Fair <br />Housin oordinator Jeanne Kelsey distributed informarion on the Fair, and asked members <br />� th�it� attendance. New signage was displayed for locarion at fourteen (14) different corners <br />�"'e community to provide directional assistance; biodegradable balloons and biodegradable <br />r the Fair; and posirive comments received to-date on Roseville's lead in focusing on living <br />smarter and sustainable living. <br />Discussion included sign permits for the temporary signs; gaps in staffing the HRA booth; City <br />Councilmember participation in handing out recycling bins; and Member Fuhrman's schedule <br />conflict for the day. <br />