Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />Roseville Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Work Session <br />DRAFT Summary Notes — Wednesday, July 08, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />6) <br />and Comprehensive Plan seen as two (2) separate documents; and consensus that the docu- <br />ments should be overlaid by linking them as a overarching goal and to provide consistency. <br />New Goal <br />Linkage of HRA Strategic Plan to the Comprehensive Plan; and communicate that to the City <br />Council <br />���ninnoi nni Ginionirio��ni io��nnn���*Q n�o rn4Cyni�� <br />After further discussion, it was the consensus that Goal III incorporate Goal #3 from the Compre- <br />hensive Plan related to available financial resources by modifying Policy b) or X':�ather than as a <br />separate goal. <br />Goal II <br />Discussion included whether to include HIA policy recommendatio thi � however noting <br />that HIA's were related to maintenance issues not new housin �, whether II was broad <br />enough to included HIA's and maintenance goals; whetherto reYise language to ed housing <br />options and housing "assistance;" or whether to insert HIA's � oal II a) or Goal I <br />It was the consensus that language related to mainta� existi ��"' ousing stock, beyond code <br />enforcement issues, needed to be included; HRA re, and recommendations to the City <br />Council on maintenance issues, similar to code enfo .•__ n�� es providing tangible results. <br />Goal II c <br />Add policy related to Housing Improvement Assessments ; how to utilize them; and sup- <br />porting housing options. <br />Goals V and VI (combined as one) <br />Discussion included "official controls;" li si �hether HIA may fit there as a funding mecha- <br />nism; preserving architecture of neighbo in maintaining and preserving homes, rather than <br />enforcement; and the stick the carr ' <br />Add Policv e): Incorp " e Poli .1 from t.`�omprehensive Plan related to transit modes. <br />Add lanquaqe: er info '`�f basic green improvements they can make to their <br />homes. <br />Add Policv fl: Walk ;�r connectivity <br />Ad �� c �, itectu ��`tegrity of neighborhoods <br />oal VIII. The b rd has responsibility to respond to priorities, develop, drive and evaluate <br />he success of �'° 'using strategies and coordinate involving stakeholders. <br />cussion inc d whether the last phrase was necessary "...strategies and coordinate involv- <br />keho ;" limited interaction with the public at the HRA meeting level; successful interac- <br />tio e Home and Garden Fair; and value of creating neighborhoods. <br />New Gc�al IX. Linkage to 2030 Comprehensive Plan <br />New Goal X. Neighborhood identity. <br />Further discussion of Goal VIII was held, including the need to evaluate the success of housing <br />initiatives through coordination with stakeholders and listening to the public; institutionalizing the <br />renal program model to involve citizens; and removing "involve" from the goal language. <br />Programming to Implement Updated Strategic Plan <br />