Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />diverse resident prof�le, but we anticipate that a higher proportion of young to mid-a�e pro- <br />fessionals as well as singles and couples across the age span wouId be captured at th.e �eve]- <br />opment. Additionally, due to the lacations ofNorthwestern College and Bethel University, <br />it is ]ikely sorr�e units wouId be occupied by college students andlor recent graduates who <br />reside as room�nates. <br />The new rt�arket rate renta] units should be designed and priced comparable to the two exist- <br />ing luxury properties in Roseville as well as contemparary properties located in the sur- <br />rovnding suburbs. VJe beiieve the addition of such a rental building will facilitate greater <br />housing choice in the City and wilI betCer serve the needs of househoids that live and/or cur- <br />rently work in Roseville. <br />New rental properties under canstruction or recently develo�ed in the Twin Cities are charg- <br />�ng rents on average from $1.25 to $].50 per square foot in suburban [oca�ions to $1.80 to <br />$2.00 per square foot in high-amenity urban locations such as Minneapolis and St. PauI. <br />New suburban properties in third and fourth-tier suburban communities such as Lake�ille, <br />Eagan and Woodbury are charging beiween $1.25 and $1.40, on average. A praject tn <br />Roseviile would fall within the a%rementioned price per square foot range far suburban <br />communities, approximately $ I.25 to $1.35 per square foot. <br />• A�fordable Rental Housing — <br />Although there is demand for approximately 185 affordabla units over the next decade, we <br />recomrnend phasing the units with no more than 84- to- ] p0 units in the short-term targeting <br />moderate-income household �ypes. Much of the existing rental stoc[c that funetions as af <br />fordable housing is in multistory buildings with a higher percentage of smaller unit types, <br />which often cannot comfartably accommodate family households. New affordable units <br />woulcf attract many existing Raseville residents residing in o�der rnarket rate properties seek- <br />ing larger unit sizes and more modern unit and buiIding amenities. ln addition, affordable <br />housing wilI be attractive to households frotn outside Raseville who seek to reside in the <br />community to have close proximify to emp[oyment, shopping, and schools. As a result, the <br />demand %r affordable products could be evep high:er than what is actually stated. <br />We recommend an affordable famtly townhame companent with a mix of two- and three- <br />bedroom units that cauld be designed as rowhomes or baek-to-back structures in order to <br />manage the development costs Qf these units. Alternatively, a traditional three-stary build- <br />ing would also accor�modate affordable demand should the unit mix be weighted towards <br />Iarger unit sizes. Over the next decade, affordable housing demand is sufiicie�t to be able to <br />accommodate housing types in both townhome-style and apartment-style buildings. <br />With new rental housing units added to the City of Roseville, there may be mcreased occupan- <br />cies a�rtong the existing rental stock, particularly among older properties that are unable to com- <br />pete with newer, conternporary rnarket rate properties. Accordin� to Metro HRA, approximate�y <br />21 � Section 8 housing vouchers are being utilized in the City. We recommend an increase in the <br />acceptance of �ouchers in order to meet the signi�cant demand for subsidized housing in the <br />City of Roseville. <br />MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. � j <br />