Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />g <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />HRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />available for future redevelopment. Mr. Mullins noted tl�at one of the challenges facing the City is that <br />a majority of the community's housing stock was built in the 1950's through 1970's, and that the <br />community was heavily-weighted in one bedroom homes, impacting resale data. Mr. Mullins reviewed <br />that resale data, specific to ramblers and 1-1/2 story homes, represenring 70% of all single-family home <br />sales. Mr. Mullins suggested that the City consider pursuing successful ventures for private/public <br />partnerships to assist developers with financial barriers for redevelopment. Mr. Mullins also noted that <br />expanding current rambler housing stock by adding a second story may be prudent for those homes <br />applicable to such remodeling. <br />Based on the findings and challenges/opportuniries in the full report, Mr. Mullins su " <br />addressing City development priorities that the City considers: <br />1) Affordable active adult senior housing community — currently no active adult s� �� ���� i <br />time; <br />2) Affordable family rental housing; <br />3) Market rate general occupancy rental housing (upscale market); ��, � <br />4) Availability of Section 8 housing vouchers — only 210 in City ng� "'' being issued <br />that in <br />at this <br />community — some way to get more vouchers to serve as many a� �ossible. <br />5) Working with exisring properry owners for rehabilitatio�replace�t of those buildings — <br />unforiunate deferred maintenance in evidence; r�� . <br />6) Owner-occupied (cooperarive preferred) active adult se ��� 'n �'�"� <br />7) General occupancy for-sale townhomes for entty-level buye older adult/senior households; <br />and <br />8) Reassess service-enhanced senior housing needs. <br />Member Pust questioned if there was a stand� <br />with Mr. Mullins responding that there was r <br />substantial number for a community the size of <br />�ouchers based on population; <br />ver, opined that 210 was not a <br />housing was always in demand. <br />Mr. Mullins concluded his presentation by remi ' g members that housing projects attract residents <br />from a wide geography, with 30-40% occupanc�'"�rom other suburban communiries; including adult <br />children moving parent(s) in�c� ���r housing witlti�,�ir own community. Mr. Mullins further noted <br />that while there may not,ap�i�� � be a huge dem�iid for senior housing from Roseville residents, to <br />remember that such ho��in� in ``" er-rin� subu�i would draw from a much wider area. <br />Mr. Mullins <br />would be forthcoming to the HRA and staff. <br />Discussion included tren ock�down/rebuild housing, with such trends being more prevalent in <br />suburbs s�ck� a� ����a and . is' Park, and other communities iniriating ordinances addressing how <br />much, '����� "��� as allo�;�le on properties; and reiterated that in the future, additional second- <br />story additions wo �, e in e�idence for inner-ring communities for current rambles, for those desiring <br />�remain in their cu� ;, t communiries for convenience and/or quality of life issues. <br />�.,�r discussio ��icluded whether a need for intergenerational housing was indicated, with Mr. <br />M�o� ,�" opuung , t this type of housing was not being seen to a great eatent in MN at this time, and <br />was ��„ E�Spean concept, but would be a great idea for the future. <br />Addition� discussion included the rationale for continuing strong marketing and profitability for senior <br />(55 and�over) housing, with luaury or rental housing being the concentrated market for for-profit <br />developers; in addirion to faith-affiliated senior housing, with many of those faith based facilities <br />having available land and willing to parcel some of it for senior housing, and also addressing that faith- <br />based mission for serving seniors as they age (i.e., Presbyterian Homes and Ecumen). Mr. Mullins <br />opined that faith-based remained the best private/public partnership for a community, as it subsidized <br />the project via their donarion of the land, thereby reducing costs for the housing and addressing the <br />service from their faith perspective to that senior generarion. <br />