Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment D <br />�5: Commissioner Boerigter noted that, once the zoning code was rewritten, and unless there was a run of <br />�5: church use applications between now and that rewrite, the B-3 District would no longer exist so the <br />15� problem would not exist. <br />155 Commissioner Gisselquist concurred with Commissioner Boerigter; observing that the Comprehensive <br />�5F Plan provided no guidance for church uses; and that if you were "grandfathered in" you were fine, but if <br />157 not, there were limited options available. Commissioner Gisselquist opined that he was not supportive <br />�5� of spot zoning, and he personally didn't like to contribute to something that could be perceived as such; <br />15� however he noted that the Commission was attempting to make do with the zoning currently in place. <br />�6o Commissioner Gisselquist noted that his initial reaction when reviewing the proposal had been that this <br />�6� seemed to be an overly broad solution to a unique situation; however, when listening to the rationale of <br />�62 Commissioner Boerigter, he concurred with his comments. Commissioner Gisselquist noted that newer <br />163 churches were beyond the smaller neighborhood, traditional churches, with a multitude of different <br />164 service options; and opined that this may be an appropriate location for a church of this size. <br />�65 Commissioner Wozniak noted that when he first saw the proposal, his reaction had been negative, <br />�6F given the location next to a car dealership that appeared inappropriate; however, he noted the parallels <br />16; between a regional business and regional church use such as this; and opined that he was persuaded <br />�6� by the arguments of the City's Imagine Roseville 2025 community vision. Commissioner Wozniak <br />�6y opined that this is not the right site for a church due to its isolation; and concurred with staff that a <br />��c location in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area would be more appropriate. <br />��� Commissioner Boerigter recognized staff's recommendation, noting that he seldom criticized their <br />��: rationale; however, he questioned whether the bottom line was that this site was seen as more valuable <br />��: for a tax revenue-generating use than the church us. <br />174 Commissioner Wozniak opined that he would prefer to remove the tax issue from consideration, and <br />��� focus on land use only; further opining that he was persuaded by the arguments that tax revenues were <br />��E equitable on one side of I-35 or the other; but continued to oppose the proposed location due to its <br />��; isolation and inappropriateness with adjacent business uses. <br />��� MOTION <br />��� Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Gisselquist to RECOMMEND TO THE CITY <br />�8� COUNCIL APPROVAL of the proposed ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT for Twin City Chinese <br />�8� Christian Church to allow churches as a permitted use in the General Business District. <br />�82 Commissioner Wozniak sought clarification from staff on the ramifications of the proposed action. <br />�as City Planner Thomas Paschke advised that staff would take action for approval into consideration as it <br />�8� proceeded with the zoning code rewrite and whether this as a permitted use under the B-3 Zoning <br />�8� District, if ultimately approved by the City Council and whether additional parameters should be created <br />�8E to allow churches in the future in regional business districts or whether to rezone this site as a different <br />�8; zoning distinction through clarifying textual information under that land use designation. <br />�8� Discussion among Commissioners and staff included an alternative to zoning code text amendment to <br />�89 allow the proposed use, with staff clarifying that the only option for the Commission at this time was to <br />�90 support or deny the request; using the PUD process or an amendment to the existing Conditional Use <br />�9� under the current zoning ordinance, requiring the request to return to the Commission as a new <br />19: application providing for few additional advantages; the need for future discussions on appropriate sites <br />�9: for institutional uses or modifications to the existing regional business zone to support those uses; and <br />194 revising the zoning chart if the use is allowed, indicating that a church would be a permitted use with <br />195 additional review needed to determine negative impacts beyond those already analyzed. <br />196 AMENDMENT TO MOTION <br />19� Boerigter moved, Gisselquist seconded, modification of the motion to read that churches are a <br />�9s permitted use in General Business Districts, with no need for a Conditional Use Permit. <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />