My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-10-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-10-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 12:23:07 PM
Creation date
3/22/2010 12:22:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. Proposed Illicit Discharge Ordinance <br />Ms. Bloom presented a revised draft Ordinance, Section 803, as it related <br />to Storm water Illicit Discharge and Connections within the City of <br />Roseville, as federally mandated; having incorporated those revisions <br />made by the PWET Commission at their May 26, 2009 meeting. <br />Chair DeBenedet noted that, at the May meeting, the PWET Commission <br />had suggested that a more comprehensive look be given to various <br />provisions dealing with storm water in various ordinances, bringing them <br />to one place for better efficiencies for staff and making it easier and more <br />understandable for property owners in Roseville for compliance purposes. <br />Member Stenlund spoke in support of staff preparation of an information <br />packet, including graphics that would go beyond the legal language of the <br />ordinance, but provide the public with more realistic information. <br />Member Stenlund noted one glaring omission was the lack of a definition <br />of "Water." <br />Ms. Bloom advised that staff had been discussion staging of the <br />information, with the ordinance serving as a foundation, similar to that of <br />the recently-adopted ordinance on fertilizer, the door hangers that were <br />provided, and additional information developed for practical use; as well <br />as the previous discussion on the pool drainage issues and process needing <br />to be developed. Ms. Bloom noted that property owners needed to be <br />aware of the code, issues, and their actions needed for compliance. Ms. <br />Bloom sought input from Members, keeping that process in mind, as to <br />whether this ordinance language was moving in the right direction in <br />defining an illicit discharge, with staff continuing to train with Rice Creek <br />Watershed District to work through discharge and detections issues. <br />Discussion among Members and staff included adding to the "Purpose" <br />statement for the goal of preserving the Central Park Water System, based <br />on the interconnectivity and need to preserve this fragment of the 10,000 <br />lake system in MN; and providing for additional definitions that may seem <br />obvious, but not so to residents. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that the draft ordinance was based on language <br />modeled after the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Illicit <br />Discharge Ordinance; and that ,while the City's existing ordinance <br />provisions were based on best management practices, following review <br />and enforcement attempts over the last year, it was found that the <br />ordinance language wasn't strong enough to enforce; and that an <br />ordinance was needed to expressly apply to that area, based on the annual <br />permit for the City with the MPCA, with language updated based on the <br />NIPCA webpage ordinance. <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.