My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-10-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-10-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 12:23:07 PM
Creation date
3/22/2010 12:22:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to ensure that this will be more enforceable and better monitored; and <br />making it easy for residents to comply with action plans without <br />exceeding government interference, based on the tools provided to them <br />by the City. <br />Further discussion included sample scenarios of the difficulty of <br />enforcement by staff when they are alerted to anon-compliant activity by <br />phone, with the activity no longer evidenced when staff is able to respond; <br />educational information for suspected violations based on present practice, <br />based on a "carrot' rather than a "stick," when a situation is no longer <br />legally enforceable. <br />Member Felice suggested the need to educate groups (i.e., Boy Scouts or <br />other youth groups doing car wash fundraisers), who could in turn serve as <br />examples to others based on their understanding of the importance of <br />water quality and their visual example for easy compliance. Member <br />Felice opined that, if this started as an educational process, with them <br />seeking permits to hold the car washes, it could become common practice <br />after 2-3 years. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that this was a good question for the City Attorney, <br />whether educational or permitted activities were included; how to <br />distinguish one from the other; and how to define by the number of <br />vehicles. <br />It was the consensus of members that most residents wanted to do the right <br />thing, but may be unaware of the impacts to water quality of their personal <br />or individual actions and activities. <br />Additional discussion included the compliance of mobile washing trucks; <br />compliance needed for carpet cleaning businesses with tanks on their <br />trucks; whether community-based groups, earning money, should be <br />exempted if they could prove that they had a process in place to manage <br />suds, and had sought a variance or permit from the City to wash cars in a <br />community space; and clarification that it was not illegal to wash a car, <br />only to discharge the water into the sanitary stormsewer system to educate <br />people that they needed to implement a system in washing cars to keep the <br />water from entering the sanitary system. <br />Pa'~e 3, Section H, General Provisions <br />Add an additional exemption:... unless the discharge conforms with the <br />approved City of Roseville Plan to manage it. OR ... community-based <br />organizations proposing car washes, or other similar activity, shall submit <br />an action plan to the Public Works Director. <br />Add to #5 ... car washes, or including but not limited to carwashes; to <br />include washing siding (i.e., lead paint); service-groups; non-commercial <br />entities; community groups... <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.