My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-11-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-11-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 1:42:39 PM
Creation date
3/22/2010 1:42:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/24/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioners requested, and staff provided, an update on the Ramsey <br />County reconstruction of the intersection of Fairview Avenue, as well as at <br />County Road B-2 and Snelling Avenue, and staff's request for further <br />review of cost benefits and modeling options for turn lanes based on <br />significant right-of--way impacts to some property owners. Staff advised <br />that they would return to the PWET Commission for further discussion as <br />more information was made available. <br />At the request of Commissioner Gjerdingen, staff updated the Commission <br />on the Fairview Corridor project, with the technician initiating drafting <br />designs, once completion of the observation of two other projects was <br />completed, with involvement of the Commission at that time, anticipated <br />in early 2010. <br />5. 2010 Budget Update <br />Mr. Schwartz provided an update of ongoing Budgeting for Outcomes <br />(BFO) budget discussion by the City Council and revised spreadsheets <br />based on those discussions and the City Manager-recommended 2010 <br />budget. Mr. Schwartz briefly reviewed how those discussions may impact <br />the Public Works Department, and additional information being provided <br />at the City Council's request specific to the department. <br />Discussion included tax-supported funds versus enterprise funds and fee- <br />supported areas; interest earnings; differentials in the Storm Water Utility <br />Fund reflecting variations in the Capital Investment Program (CIP) Fund; <br />reserves; individual and composite rankings of staff and the City Council; <br />impacts to the City's Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and street <br />maintenance levels being brought back up to normal levels with reserves <br />in place; reductions in streetscape maintenance of $20,000; identification <br />of potential revenue sources with new fees approved by the City Council <br />for development plan review by the Engineering Department; and atwo- <br />year contract for Building Maintenance services. <br />Additional discussion included identifying the allotment to the Pathway <br />Maintenance Fund; and Diseased and Hazardous Tree Removal allotment <br />that would cover removal but little if any for replacement. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted one significant area in the City Manager- <br />recommended budget that had received the most discussion and <br />controversy had been the elimination of outdoor skating rinks. <br />Mr. Schwartz addressed other areas related to public safety and <br />subsequent impacts, such as zero COLA for employees, with the City <br />Council requesting additional cost-savings if step increases were frozen <br />for new employees and impacts to existing union agreements; request to <br />review potential elimination of all or non-essential overtime, which would <br />impact snowplowing operations; reduced training and conference <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.