My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-11-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-11-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 1:42:39 PM
Creation date
3/22/2010 1:42:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/24/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of street sweeping funded through the stormwater utility fund, and cost <br />considerations of the Discharge Ordinance currently being drafted; and <br />possible revenues from a street light utility fee. <br />Chair DeBenedet opined that some costs are impossible to control based <br />on increased inflationary rates that served to cause issues with other <br />aspects of the budget that made it challenging for the City to keep taxes at <br />inflation or below. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that it wasn't so much inflation driving the need for <br />increased taxes at this time, but major cost impacts due to spending <br />decisions made in the past, such as depletion of the Equipment <br />Replacement Fund over the last decade, with depreciation funds not being <br />funded, and new spending in 2010 due to the skating center geothermal <br />refrigeration replacement project coming onboard, as well as impacts <br />from the state's reduction in Market Value Homestead Credit funds <br />(MVHS) that alone is $450,000 for 2010. Mr. Schwartz noted that these <br />are just a few of the larger items creating competition for funds in the <br />2010 budget. <br />Commissioner Vanderwall requested that Mr. Schwartz provide the <br />PWET Commissioners with an electronic copy of the 2010 proposed <br />budget sorted by department; opining that comparison of the individual <br />and composite City Council rankings would be good discussion items <br />before the next joint City Council/PWET Commission annual meeting. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that he would provide that breakdown via e-mail. <br />6. Additional Solid Waste Collection Information <br />Mr. Schwartz indicated that staff had prepared no additional information <br />for tonight's meeting, but sought direction on the next step. <br />Discussion among Commissioners and staff included whether the <br />Commission felt it had received sufficient research and comparison <br />information to-date from staff to facilitate their decision-making; <br />assumptions of the MPCA report referenced by the hauler at the October <br />PWET Commission meeting; "boogey" tires on trucks and distribution of <br />the load on the wheels and how much of a difference that made related to <br />damage to roads or if this was simply used to meet weight requirements <br />and stay below design capacity of a roadway; and similar torque effects to <br />pavement friction with braking to stop a mass being stopped whether <br />additional axles were used or not. <br />Commissioner Vanderwall opined that sufficient information-gathering <br />had occurred, and that now that information needed to be quantified with <br />the PWET Commission working on a proposal to improve conditions in <br />the community. <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.