My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-12-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-12-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 1:50:37 PM
Creation date
3/22/2010 1:50:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/22/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
revisions; and inclusion of federal and state law references governing <br />waste. <br />Various sections of the revised ordinance were reviewed, and discussion <br />included the draft ordinance's consistency as to form with other City <br />ordinances; current rewrite of the entire zoning code with the stormwater <br />chapter also undergoing revisions that will make it consistent with this <br />proposed ordinance; and references to "The City" as the municipal <br />organization itself. <br />Other areas for reconsideration: <br />• Page 1, A. Purpose Statement (Stenlund): Change "effects" to <br />"caused" <br />• Page 4, H. General Provisions: link #1's 1 and 6; change language to <br />"leave, store or deposit discharge..." <br />• Consider linking # 1 and #6 under Item #5 to address leakage? <br />(Vanderwall) <br />• Page 5, Section J, subsection 1 (Vanderwall); grammatical correction <br />• Page 5, add #1 (iv.) and bring forward portions of #6 (i) (Felice) <br />Further discussion included staff's ability to reasonably enforce the <br />ordinance; definition of potential discharges for determination by a court <br />of law; unsealed containers containing chemicals or other hazardous <br />materials; timing of chlorine disposal based on dissipation and potential <br />ambiguity of specific language for seven (7) days; adding language to <br />page 5, Section 7 (ii) that materials shall be contained immediately and <br />removed as soon as possible; and the intent of page 5, Section 7, <br />subsection I. related to industrial or construction activity discharges and <br />acceptable forms for review. <br />Ms. Bloom noted that the intent of that section of the code was that <br />anyone discharging for industrial activities would provide the Public <br />Works Director with a copy of their permit; but that there was no intent to <br />set up a separate review process for the City beyond that of the MPCA. <br />Member Vanderwall suggested that language be changed to remove <br />"form" and add "manner" to clarify that it was not about the documents <br />available, but what actions satisfied the City to ensure them that you've <br />met the requirements of your permit; about action, not the permit itself. <br />Additional discussion related to Page 5, Section J and language revised by <br />the City Attorney to the process and how staff is able to enforce the <br />ordinance through a court order, based on a recent lawsuit in Little Canada <br />during their I & I inspections, with a search warrant required if staff has <br />probable cause and is denied access; with Section M suspending access to <br />the storm sewer system still applicable based on recommendation of the <br />City Attorney and in emergency situations until the City has made their <br />determination. <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.