Laserfiche WebLink
revisions; and inclusion of federal and state law references governing <br />waste. <br />Various sections of the revised ordinance were reviewed, and discussion <br />included the draft ordinance's consistency as to form with other City <br />ordinances; current rewrite of the entire zoning code with the stormwater <br />chapter also undergoing revisions that will make it consistent with this <br />proposed ordinance; and references to "The City" as the municipal <br />organization itself. <br />Other areas for reconsideration: <br />• Page 1, A. Purpose Statement (Stenlund): Change "effects" to <br />"caused" <br />• Page 4, H. General Provisions: link #1's 1 and 6; change language to <br />"leave, store or deposit discharge..." <br />• Consider linking # 1 and #6 under Item #5 to address leakage? <br />(Vanderwall) <br />• Page 5, Section J, subsection 1 (Vanderwall); grammatical correction <br />• Page 5, add #1 (iv.) and bring forward portions of #6 (i) (Felice) <br />Further discussion included staff's ability to reasonably enforce the <br />ordinance; definition of potential discharges for determination by a court <br />of law; unsealed containers containing chemicals or other hazardous <br />materials; timing of chlorine disposal based on dissipation and potential <br />ambiguity of specific language for seven (7) days; adding language to <br />page 5, Section 7 (ii) that materials shall be contained immediately and <br />removed as soon as possible; and the intent of page 5, Section 7, <br />subsection I. related to industrial or construction activity discharges and <br />acceptable forms for review. <br />Ms. Bloom noted that the intent of that section of the code was that <br />anyone discharging for industrial activities would provide the Public <br />Works Director with a copy of their permit; but that there was no intent to <br />set up a separate review process for the City beyond that of the MPCA. <br />Member Vanderwall suggested that language be changed to remove <br />"form" and add "manner" to clarify that it was not about the documents <br />available, but what actions satisfied the City to ensure them that you've <br />met the requirements of your permit; about action, not the permit itself. <br />Additional discussion related to Page 5, Section J and language revised by <br />the City Attorney to the process and how staff is able to enforce the <br />ordinance through a court order, based on a recent lawsuit in Little Canada <br />during their I & I inspections, with a search warrant required if staff has <br />probable cause and is denied access; with Section M suspending access to <br />the storm sewer system still applicable based on recommendation of the <br />City Attorney and in emergency situations until the City has made their <br />determination. <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />