My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-04-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-04-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 12:29:40 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 11:55:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/22/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Public Works, environment <br />end Transportation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Tuesday, March 25, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. <br />City Council Chambers, 2b60 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br />1. IntroductionslRoll Call <br />Commission members present: Randy Neprash, Dwayne Stenlund, :Tan <br />Vanderwall, and Jim DeBenedet <br />Commission members absent: Ernie Willenbring <br />Staff present: Duane Schwartz, Public Works Director; Deb Bloom, City <br />Engineer; Pa.t Dolan, >~'leet & Facilities Supervisor <br />Others present: Chuck Janske, Bonestroo <br />2. Public Comments <br />None <br />3. Swearing in of New Member <br />New member Dwayne Stenlund was sworn in. <br />4. Approval of February 26, 2008, Meeting Minutes <br />Chair DeBenedet requested a change on Page 3, Item 7, Paragraph 2, the <br />radius of a school bus turn should have been stated as a diameter of I06' <br />rather than 1 b0' . <br />Member Neprash requested a change on Page 3, Item 7, Paragraph 3, his <br />question had not been why aren't we telling them to not use Iona Lane, but <br />why are we letting them build it. The response to the question was <br />changed as follows, "Mr. Schwartz said the City has been telling them <br />Iona Lane wasn't part of the infiastructure plan and if the developer <br />wanted to build. it, they would have to pay for it in its entirety. The <br />developer was also told the city was against them rebuilding. it." <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.