My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-07-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-07-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 2:25:00 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 12:02:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/22/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. Shoreview Green Community Awards Program. Presentation <br />Two members of the Shoreview Environmental Quality Committee, Karen <br />Eckman and Tim Pratt. Mr. Pratt informed. the Commission that this <br />community programm is expanding into Roseville. The program is all about <br />clean water, and operates by encouraging more best management practices <br />usage and providing community education. For more information please <br />visit www.ci.shoreview.mn.us <br />6. Rice Street Road Design. Concept Presentation by Ramsey County Staff <br />Mary Bakeman. and Barbara Martinson from the City Planning. <br />Commission joined the PWETC at the table for the presentation. <br />Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County Engineer, spoke on the Rice Street design <br />concept: <br />Ms. Bakeman questioned whether the Rice Street design was going to be <br />wide enough to accommodate other modes of transit, including a light rail <br />system. should that arise. Mr. Tolaas said the design would not <br />accommodate light rail, but it would accommodate far side bus stops; <br />although bus lines don't necessarily want far side stops. <br />Ms. Bakeman commented on the plan switching between three-lane <br />sections and four-lane sections and how confusing that could be for <br />drivers. <br />Chair 1=}eBenedet said one thing the City needed to be aware of was <br />protecting their right to build sidewalks and to be able to have a <br />landscaping plan for the boulevards and that it was all about coordination. <br />Chair DeBenedet said to accommodate all other requirements the plan has <br />to do away with having medians. <br />Member Willenbring asked about th.e two railroad bridges south of Hwy <br />694 that were rebuilt a few years ago and if they were built wide enough <br />to accommodate the plan: Mr. Tolaas said they were in good. enough <br />condition to not need widening or rebuilding.. <br />Member Vanderwall said a bike commuting and walking path would be a <br />good addition to this route; there are immediate customers out there to use <br />it. <br />Chair DeBenedet said the City should keep moving towards burying <br />power lines. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.