My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-08-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-08-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 2:41:36 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 12:21:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/26/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Project Priori~izatio~t <br />The purpose of prioritizing projects is so the City can focus on certain projects that have been <br />deemed important. In other words, when a project is ranked as a top priority staff may develop <br />conceptual plans and budget estimates; seek additional funding from outside sources and add them to <br />the development schedule: <br />Prioritizing pathway projects for development can be a misleading task. Often project ranking <br />becomes some what skewed as sometimes lower ranking projects are developed prior to others that <br />have been ranked higher. Often there are other forces that affect the devei.opment schedule. For <br />example, local and county street reconstruction; if a. street corridor is designated to have a pathway <br />and that street is proposed for reconstruction then that project would move up because the <br />opportunity has presented itself. Likewise, if a number of projects have been submitted for external <br />funding and a lower ranked project is approved, it too would move up on the list. <br />The table on the following page shows the priority projects selected. by the Advisory Committee <br />and their subsequent average scores using the criteria ranking methodology previously defined. <br />Project Ranking <br />The following criteria are used. by the Advisory Committee to determine priority recommendations. <br />The Committee was asked to place a value from 0-5 on each criterion based on the policies and <br />standards and their understanding of the community's needs. Then they were asked to evaluate <br />projects by weighing each criterion for that specific project. The end result was a ranking that in turn <br />prioritized the projects. Listed below are the criteria used to rank projects and a brief explanation of <br />each. <br />Ranking Criteria <br />A. Connects multiple destinations. <br />Provides convenient access to businesses, schools, churches, work, parks and u variety of <br />other community amenities and destinations. <br />B. Connects to regional system. <br />Pr-avides linkage to the larger net-roark of pathn~ays that extend beyond Roseville, <br />C. Connects to Transit <br />Connects bus stops, transit hubs, or provides a connection to other transit amenities. <br />D. Provides a Safe Route to School <br />Provides a safe connection fiā¢ana neighborhoods to schools throughout Roseville and adjacent <br />communities. <br />City of Roseville Pathway Master Plan <br />Final Review Draft August 2008 Page 26 of <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.