My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-09-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-09-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2010 12:26:38 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 12:25:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/23/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s~ Sanitary Sewer Ot~erations: The City maintains a sanitary sewer collection system to ensure the general <br />~% public's health and general welfare. The single largest operating cost to the sanitary sewer operation is the <br />~- treatment costs paid to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division (MCES}. The MCES <br />ac has notified us that our treatment casts are expected to increase by approximately 4% in 2009. In addition, <br />s~ the City`s internal operating costs are expected to increase by approximately 5% reflecting higher motor <br />ss fuel, insurance, and other operating costs. <br />s <br />,~~; Like the water operation; to facilitate a change to a conservation-based rate structure, significant changes in <br />~ ~ the sanitary sewer rates need to occur. The portion of the rates designed to offset the City's fixed sanitary <br />~z sewer costs need to increase substantially, whereas the variable rate portion can be lowered. <br />~: <br />~T~ The Sanitary Sewer Fund is m good financial condition which has allowed. for lower-than-inflation rate <br />increases over the last 5 years. However, planned capital replacements over the next 10 years will <br />~~~ necessitate a rate increase in 2009. <br />~7 <br />~r Storm Water DrainageOperations: The City provides for the management of storm water drainage to <br />~~ prevent flooding and pollution control, as well as street sweeping and the leaf pickup program. The storm <br />~o sewer costs are expected to be higher than. in previous years, due to an increase in the planned capital <br />7~ replacement of stormwater systems, as well as higher costs for motor fiiel, depreciation, and other operating <br />52 GoStS. <br />7 <br />7~ Like the Sanitary Sewer Fund, the Storm Water Drainage Fund is in good financial condition which has <br />:~ allowed for lower-than-inflation rate increases over the last. 5 years: However, planned capital replacements <br />~~ over the next l0 years will necessitate rate increases in 2009. <br />Jf <br />~~ Rec, cling Operations: The recycling operation provides for the contracted curbside recycling pickup <br />~~ throughout the City. The primary operating cost is the amounts paid to a contractor to pickup recycling <br />so materials. Thanks to strong revenue sharing dollars being recouped, no rate increase will be needed for <br />~ ~ 2009. <br />sz <br />s~ Water Conservation Measures <br />~~ Based on an analysis of the City's water customers, it appears that the Roseville residents are already <br />s consuming less water than residents in many other communities. This is likely due to the fact that relatively <br />~r few residential properties in Roseville have irrigation systems, which is in contrast to soiree 2nd and 3rd ring <br />6 f suburbs. It may also be the result. of having a relatively lower population per household. However, there <br />6~ are additional measures that can betaken to encourage water conservation even further. <br />ss <br />;o To provide an even greater incentive to conserve water, Staff is recommending two changes to the City's <br />~ ~ water rate structure; a tiered water rate structure, and a summer usage rate <br />72 <br />Currently, all water users pay the same rate regardless of the amount they use. It is recommended that. a <br />~~ tiered rate be implemented that would charge residential users that consume in excess of 30,000 gallons per <br />i; quarter; a 10% rate premium. Based on current customer behavior, this would impact l0- 1. S% ofthe City's <br />~c residential customers. A tiered rate for commercial customers is not recommended given the large disparity <br />~ ~ in usage among those customers. A tiered water rate would encourage households to take year-round <br />7~; measures such as; installing water-saving devices,. and taking shorter showers. <br />is <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.