My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-09-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-09-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2010 12:26:38 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 12:25:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/23/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. Com~x-unication Items <br />Budget Impact Memo <br />Deb Bloom introduced a memo written by Public Works Director Duane <br />Schwartz outlining the proposed budget by the City Manager. The City <br />Manager's budget includes a zero budget increase for 2009 for the items <br />identified in the memo, which. would cause impacts to the scope of the <br />2009 pavement maintenance program. Ms. Bloom. said while cutting back <br />on maintenance may not be noticeable within the next two to three years, <br />there will be long-term impacts. Member Willenbring wondered how <br />many problems would arise in four or five years. Member Stenlund said <br />once you let it go you never get caught up. <br />Ms. Bloom added that the cost of paint also went up so the City will have <br />to cut back on. painting crosswalks and arrows, etc. The energy cost for <br />streetlights is expected. to go up 4% to 5%. Building maintenance costs <br />are rising as well. <br />Member Vanderwall commented that h.e sees the budget presented as <br />being short-sighted and said that the Commission needs to make sure the <br />City Council understands the repercussions of cutting maintenance <br />budgets. Member Vanderwall suggested the Commission officially <br />comment on a reduction in funding for the maintenance process. Chair <br />DeBenedet agreed and said he was very alarmed at the maintenance <br />needing to be cut because of lack of funding. Member Stenlund also <br />agreed and said once you let something go you can never get it back. <br />Member Willenbring said we just. can't let the streets go; they have to be <br />maintained somehow. <br />Chair DeBenedet wondered about the schedule and if there was enough <br />time to put an official recommendation together before the council <br />meeting. Ms. Bloom said that there is time for public comments at the <br />September 8 council meeting and that the not-to-exceed levy limit will be <br />set September 1.5. <br />Member Vanderwall moved that the 1'WETC resolve that the City Council <br />look. at a budget that will allow for the continuation of the maintenance <br />standards that are currently in place. Chair DeBenedet said we need to <br />maintain the public infrastructure in the mast cost effective manner. <br />Member Stenlund asked if budget cuts would affect. street sweeping.. Ms. <br />Bloom said street sweeping is part of the storm sewer budget, which is <br />funded from that utility fund. The budgets being cut are funded from the <br />tax levy. <br />Member Stenlund said we need to go back to the last year where <br />maintenance was being done at the optimum level and ask the City <br />Council to continue funding successive years at that level plus inflation. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.