My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-02-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-02-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2010 2:21:32 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:18:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/24/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Added benefits of reducing methane emission are that many reductions come with <br />little or no cost, reductions lower ozone concentrations near Earth's surface, and <br />methane emissions can be reduced immediately while it will take time before the <br />world's carbon-based energy infrastructure can make meaningful reductions in net <br />carbon. enussions (Platt et al., 2008. pg7). <br />Regardless of how much methane is captured front a 3andfrll or ho~v many BTUs are <br />generated froze an incinerator, waste does not generate nearly as much energy as recycling <br />conserves. Overall, recycling produces a net reduction in energy 3.b times larger than the <br />amount of energy generated by incineration and 1.1 times larger than the energy generated <br />by methane recovery at a landfill (Choate, 2005}. You simply cannot capture enough <br />energy front landfills or incinerators to offset the energy required to make new products <br />from natural resources to replace those we waste. <br />3. A Better Choice: Climate Change Benefits of Recycling & Composting <br />Recycling is an effective way to reduce greenhouse gases. ~ ~ . _ ~ ~ ' <br />When we recycle, we avoid the greenhouse gas emissions from ~., ~'' 1 ~• <br />_- .,~, = <br />landfills and incinerators. We also reduce the need to extract new ,' ~ '~ , <br />resources from the earth and replace logging, drilling, and mining of ~~ - --{/- '• ~~ <br />virgin materials with recycled materials that we no longer want. This s ! <br />e <br />greatly reduces the energy it takes to process and manufacture new `T <br />goods. <br />About 94%~ of the materials extracted for use in manufacturing durable products <br />become waste before the product is rnantrfactured,...80% of what we make is <br />thrown away within six months of production. For every rubbish bag placed at the <br />curb, the equivalent of 71 rubbish bags worth of waste is created in mining, <br />logging, agriculture, oil and gas exploration; and the industrial processes used to <br />convert raw materials into finished products and packaging. This doesri t even <br />include the extra energy usage and climate change impacts resulting from resource <br />extraction and processing (Hawkers, A. Lovins, L:H. Lovins, 1999). <br /> Every product we use has embedded energy, which is the energy <br />~ ~ <br />{ <br />~ it took to extract, transport, and transform the materials needed <br />~~ to produce the product. Every single item we recycle results in <br /> <br />r~ , <br />~ ~~' ~r s <br />~ significant energy savings because recycling takes advantage of <br />t , ; -. <br />i, ~ ! ~ this embedded energy. For some items, like an aluminum can, <br />"~ ~~ .~' <br />~ the energy savings are tremendous. Making a new aluminum. can. <br />,1 <br />`=` ~~~, from. o]d cans results in 90-97% energy savings compared to <br /> making a new can front bauxrte and other raw n~.aterials, <br /> according to (Choate, 2005). Similarly, it takes 30% less energy <br /> to make a glass bottle from recycled glass than from silica, sand, <br />soda ash, limestone, an d feldspar. Recycling paper results in a 44% energy savings (Choate, <br />2005). Virtually every recycled material uses less energy than its virgin component. <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.