Laserfiche WebLink
Tables 7 and 8 summatzze these numbers by category and calculate the per capita impact. <br />Table 7 calculates recycling efforts. Table 8 calculates composting efforts. The per capita <br />impact is per person, so if there are three people in a household, the family's impact is <br />three ti.nies greater. Also, Hate that a negative number means a reduction in carbon <br />emissions. <br />T~b1e 7: Scenario <br /> Curretxt li1CCAG Zero-~Y~raste <br />Cott ~trison of GIG " <br />=Red coons front i~'er~~ge <br />~ 2(112 Goal Scenario <br /> Scerzaric~ Scenario (h1,i-:eti~tttn) <br />RECXGLING et4ort_i <br />1. Curbside Recycling (toms) 1,560,937 2,041.,897 2,763,337 <br />2. llrop ofl~Recycling (tons) 20,687 148,847 341,087 <br />3. Compost (tons} N/A N/A N/A <br />4. Wood/computers/tires (tons) 133,136 235,376 388,736 <br />5. Avoided Disposal (tons) 629,833 693,193 788,233 <br />6. Exte~~ded Producer RespansiUly N/A N/A N/A <br />Total Recycling (tans) 2,344,593 3,119,373 4.281,393 <br />Diversion from Recycling 38% 51% 7D% <br />of total waste) <br />Total GHG reductions <br />from RECYCLING efI'arts (6,115,739.D0} (8,257,862.60} (11,471,04$.00) <br />(tons COZE) <br />GHG Reductions per person per <br />year froth RECYCLING efforts (2,352.21} {3,176:10} (4,411.94} <br />(pounds CO,E} <br />-_ <br />Tab~e' 8: Scenario _ _ _ - <br /> <br />Co~rn~ariso~t of GHG 3 Current <br />I flICC~G Zero-haste <br />E <br />Reductions <br />. #i'un~ Z Average 2f112 Goal Scenario <br />. <br />' Scenario ~ Scenario (ttil3~imnm} <br />Y'ING efforts i <br />COMPOS <br />3. Composting (tans) 179,043 643,443 1,107,843 <br />%Diversion from Composting 3n/° l ln~y 180/ <br />(of total waste} <br />Total GHG reductions <br />from COMF05TING efforts {103,388.OD} (161,786.90) (186,815:00} <br />(tons COzE) <br />GHG reductions per person per <br />year from COMPOSTING etI'orts (39.76} (62.23) {71.85} <br />{pounds COZE) <br />Page 15 <br />