Laserfiche WebLink
167 eliminating the infiltration capacity of the basin. This resulted in localized flooding of <br />16$ the surrounding properties: As a part of the Applewood Pointe redevelopment project in <br />l 69 2003, the City reconstructed this pond. The reconstruction project nearly doubled the <br />170 capacity of the basin. Years of sediment accumulation. was excavated, restoring the <br />171 infiltration capacity that had been sealed. In addition, a lift station was constructed to <br />172 provide a secondary outlet for extreme events. The new pond serves as a regional storm <br />173 water treatment facility for the subwatershed. <br />174 Recommended 2009 action: <br />175 This area has been removed from the CSWMP problem areas. <br />176 F. Area G: 35W corridor <br />177 Historically the City has observed flooding within the 35W corridor ponds after extreme <br />1'78 rain events. These ponds include the basins on both sides of the 35W just to the north of <br />179 County Road C and around the highway ramps. The primary concern for these <br />180 subwatersheds is the downstream pipe located within the Mn/DOT right- of way. This <br />1$1 pipe is 21 inches in diameter. Simply increasing the size of the pipe would push the <br />182 problem down stream causing flooding in another location. Also, this corridor is located <br />183 within Rice Creek Watershed and their new volume reduction standards would not <br />1.84 support an increase to the runoff discharged to Long Lake. As a part of the County Road <br />185 C project, additional storage was constructed to address the runoff from County Road C <br />186 through ponding and rain gardens. <br />187 Actian to Date: <br />188 This subwatershed was added as a problem area in 2006. <br />189 Recommended 2009 action: <br />190 In an effort to address some of the flooding concerns in this problem area; staff will <br />1.91 continue to require redevelopment projects to reduce the volume of water that is sent to <br />192 this system. A reduction in the peak flow from the commercial properties located in the <br />193 subwatershed will alleviate the demand on the 35W trunk sewer.. <br />194 G. Area 7: Como Sub 7- Gottfried Pit <br />195 In 2003, the City of Roseville cooperated with Capitol Region Watershed 17istrict <br />196 {CRWD), falcon Heights, the City of St. Paul, and Ramsey County on a study of down <br />197 stream flooding and water qualityissues for the northwestern watershed area to Como <br />198 Lake. All of these entities contribute storm water flow to Como Lake. This study <br />199 identified improvements that would. be made to mitigate the ongoing storm water issues <br />200 in this area. The study also assigned proportional cost shares to each entity based on <br />201 contributory flow with CRWD agreeing to contribute funding for a portion of the <br />202 improvements. They served as the lead agency on this study and for the subsequent <br />203 improvements to occur on the Como Golf Course and additional storage at Arlington and <br />204 Hamline Ave~naes. <br />205 Roseville drains 315 acres into Como Lake via Gottfried Pit near Fernwood Street and <br />206 Larpenteur Avenue: The work completed as a part of the agreement does not completely <br />2.07 address the drainage concerns detailed in the report. <br />208 <br />209 <br />City of Roseville <br />2008 Storm Water Annual Report Page 6 of 14 <br />