Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Klausing sought a specific charge for the PWET. <br />Councilmember Pust suggested that the PWET have an environmental <br />discussion based on potential noise, dust and smell concerns, from their <br />expertise and perspective. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of that motion. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion; noting that this was a <br />land use issue that had been heard through the Planning Commission <br />process; and while he shared some of the concerns expressed, opined that <br />this was more appropriately dealt with in the zoning context. Mayor <br />Klausing reiterated the potential need for future discussions at the <br />Planning Commission and City Council level related to allowable uses in <br />specific zoning code. <br />Councilmember Roe spoke in support of referring the issue to the City's <br />PWET, with a specific charge to provide feedback or advice to the extent <br />of regulatory schemes for this type of facility; and how that use fit into <br />that location in Roseville; clarifying that this was strictly advisory <br />information being sought. <br />Councilmember Johnson concurred with Councilmember Roe's <br />comments; and stipulated that the discussion at the PWET level provide a <br />direct correlation to the stared materials outdoors. <br />Roll CaTI <br />Ayes: Roe; Johnson; Ihlan; and Pust. <br />Nays. Klausing. <br />Motion carried. <br />