Laserfiche WebLink
Member Vaderwall moved to recommend approval of the proposal. of the site with <br />the following recommendations: MEDS sheet be provided to the City on all <br />materials, no storm water infiltration, if there is infiltration that ground water <br />monitoring be installed and storm water should be reused.. Other considerations <br />that should be looked at are vehicle wheel washout, noise issues and dust issues. <br />Member Stenlund seconded. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carved <br />6. Illicit Discharge Storm Water Ordinance <br />Duane Schwartz announced the need to have an ordinance for illicit discharge <br />storm water as a part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program. Member <br />Vanderwall asked to have the word inspect or investigate added to the ordinance. <br />Member DeBenedet asked if the Erosion Control ordinance could be combined <br />with the illicit discharge storm water ordinance into one storm water ordinance. <br />Duane Schwartz stated Erosion Control falls in the zoning ordinance and storm <br />water is Public Works. <br />Member Stenlund suggested having a guide with pictures for the public to know <br />what illicit discharge is. <br />Member DeBenedet mentioned how threatened discharge that presents a danger is <br />defined and how should it be dealt with. Duane Schwartz mentioned the <br />enforcement of this needs to be defined. <br />Member DeBenedet asked to review ordinance at the June meeting. <br />7. Storm Water Treatment Credit Policy Review <br />Duane Schwartz announced a need to determine at what level someone gets a <br />credit for storm water treatment. Member DeBenedet asked is it fair for a new <br />applicant or for someone redeveloping a site to get the credit just for complying <br />with the regulations. Perhaps a couple of case studies can be done to research <br />who benefits from this credit. <br />Member Vanderwall mentioned the Rainbow site where they spent money to treat <br />their storm water, they received a credit. This situation has set a precedent for <br />other situations. Duane Schwartz asked ifsomeone has exceeded the City's goals <br />does that warrant a credit or can someone just meet the goals and qualify for <br />credit. Member Stenlund stated there should be no reduction for someone that <br />just meets the goals. <br />Member DeBenedet mentioned there should be a maximum of how much can be <br />credited. Member Stenlund mentioned there should be more of an incentive. <br />