My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-09-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-09-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 3:18:40 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/22/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
funding continues to be less than that required to maintain the Review of Trash <br />streets at their current condition the quality of the City's streets will C <br />Q ~ <br /> <br />decrease over time and maintenance costs will increase. This is a O <br />eC~lOrl <br />negative cycle and one that should be avoided if at ail possible. I rn pacts <br />' <br />Analysis h <br />Omen Competition vs.__Districted Collection Impacts <br />In general, all other factors the same, moving from an open <br />competition collection system to a districted collection system <br />would be expected to reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled <br />with a corresponding decrease in the associated street <br />maintenance impacts. However, when considering trash truck <br />street maintenance impacts and the potential effect of districted <br />collection on those impacts it is important to consider that: <br />^ Bath the size of the collection vehicles and the average <br />number of passes each vehicle makes down each <br />residential street segment may change under a districted <br />system. As a result the impact per vehicle may be more or <br />less than under the current open competition system. <br />^ At least one hauler provides both residential and <br />commercial service with the same vehicle. if that hauler <br />was not awarded a residential district its vehicles would <br />continue #o impact those residential streets it uses to <br />access commercial accounts, assuming it continued to <br />provide commercial service. <br />^ If a hauler{s} not currently providing residential or <br />commercial service in the City was awarded a district <br />under a competitive procurement, that hauler might also <br />compete for commercial accounts with a resulting increase <br />in commercial trash truck impacts. <br />Our approach to projecting trash truck street maintenance impacts <br />is based on common principles of pavement design and vehicle <br />loading. The basic premise is that all vehicles, including trash <br />trucks, exert an impact on streets that can be quantified. That <br />impact or "vehicle loading" can be expressed as an Equivalent <br />Single Axie Load {ESAL), which is a function of the vehicle's <br />weight and the distribution of that weight over the vehicles axles. <br />By projecting the number and type of vehicles {e.g., cars, trucks, <br />trash trucks) that travel on a street over its design life, and the <br />average ESAL associated with each vehicle type, the total ESALs <br />that street will experience can be calculated. The relative impact <br />associated with a specific type of vehicle {e.g., trash trucks) can <br />then be determined based on the percentage of the total ESALs <br />attributed to that vehicle type. <br />Far purposes of our analysis, we requested information on the <br />types of residen#ial trash and recycling trucks Used by the licensed <br />haulers and their average load weights. We also obtained <br />Section 2 - 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.