My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-12-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-12-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2010 3:51:08 PM
Creation date
3/23/2010 2:52:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/22/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 5 -November 24, 2009 <br />rinks, with proper training and supervision provided by City staff under some <br />circumstances. <br />Bob Willmus, Representing the Parks and Recreation Commission <br />Ms. Willmus noted that outdoor ice rinks are intended to service neighborhood <br />areas surrounding those parks, and were not intended to be a branch of the <br />Roseville Youth Hockey Association. Mr. Willmus advised that annual costs of <br />operating and maintaining those outdoor rinks were $40-45,000, basically <br />consisting of 80% labor in addition to use of City equipment and the tanker truck <br />to flood them. Mr. Willmus noted that, while identifie_ d as a dollar figure, it <br />translates into an employee who was also utilized to other duties when not <br />maintaining outdoor rinks, with those impacts and ripple effects recognized by the <br />City Council in their budget deliberations. Mr. Willmus advised that impacts of <br />the ripple effect were of great concern to the Parks and Recreation Commission. <br />Discussion among PWET Commis <br />those items appearing to be cost-say <br />overall day-to-day operations witl <br />deferring annual PMP maintenance <br />and costing more in the long run; <br />impacting risk management, such a <br />response and environmental impact <br />School Districts and bus routes; an <br />decade saving time and equipmen <br />based on amount of precipitation in <br />and advances in technologies for th <br />Mr. Willmus included recognizing <br />res may not prove beneficial to the <br />none departments; similarities in <br />activities..shortening the life-span of roadways <br />level of service for snow plowing frequency <br />s icy intersections, with snow and ice chemical <br />s; policies matching practices; impacts to the <br />d reduction of salt and sand usage over the last <br />t costs by managing the rate of application <br />ice and snow, air and pavement temperatures, <br />e type of materials and its applications. <br />Further discussion included public perception of changing policies based on <br />budget limitations creating situations impacting their driving habits; loss of life or <br />major accidents based on reduced service levels; trade-offs in property taxes <br />versus level of services provided; annual cost of snow plowing at this time <br />estimated at $130,000; costs and other service levels of street sweeping funded <br />through the stormwater utility fund, and cost considerations of the Discharge <br />Ordinance currently being drafted; and possible revenues from a street light utility <br />fee. <br />Chair DeBenedet opined that some costs are impossible to control based on <br />increased inflationary rates that served to cause issues with other aspects of the <br />budget that made it challenging for the City to keep taxes at inflation or below. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that it wasn't so much inflation driving the need for <br />increased taxes at this tune, but major cost impacts due to spending decisions <br />made in the past, such as depletion of the Equipment Replacement Fund over the <br />last decade, with depreciation funds not being funded, and new spending in 2010 <br />due to the skating center geothermal refrigeration replacement project coming on <br />board, as well as itnpacts from the state's reduction in Market Value Homestead <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.