My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-05-18_Agenda
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2004
>
2004-05-18_Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2015 1:01:10 PM
Creation date
3/25/2010 1:39:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/18/2004
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
requirements for phosphorus reduction for the proposed development. (It is unclear <br />whether the Watershed understood the shared access concept to reduce pavement.) <br />A copy of the review letter is provided as Appendix D of this report. <br />The Roseville City Engineer reviewed the CRWD’s review of storm water and concurs with their <br />findings with the following additional comments. <br />The report assumes that there is not a wetland on the northerly parcel. This will need to <br />be verified by a wetland delineation. The boundaries of the wetland on the Guptil <br />property will need to be delineated as well. <br />Assuming the development occurs as described in the report. The ponding as proposed <br />would accommodate runoff from both sites. If you change the parameters of the reports <br />(i.e. increase impervious), the storm water recommendations will no longer be valid. The <br />Elmer site density could be attached to the Guptil site, however, it will change the storm <br />water retention and treatment requirements if there is additional proposed development <br />on the Elmer site. <br />The watermain will need to be looped through the development. <br />Traffic\Access: <br />The traffic patterns in the area are 22,000 daily vehicle trips on Rice Street, 17,000 on <br />Larpenteur, less than 1,000 on North McCarrons, and 700 on Western Avenue. There is no <br />significant growth projected on these streets. Rice Street at Highway 36 will eventually have <br />MnDOT commuter parking and Transit pick-up shelter, primary for riders heading to downtown <br />Minneapolis and St. Paul. <br />Additional access to the site from both the north and south is critical. A high-density <br />redevelopment plan for the Guptil site will generate between 200 to 400 additional trips per day, <br />which will be distributed among and along the two exit areas (Elmer and McCarrons, as well as <br />Rice Street). If developed as a senior facility, such facilities tend to have 40 to 60% less traffic <br />than other types of housing. The neighborhood’s existing vehicle trips are estimated at <br />approximately 800 to 1000 trips per day. The traffic capacity levels of the existing roadways, <br />Elmer and McCarrons, are 2,000 trips per day based upon a standard width road. <br />16.Light, noise and visual pollution: <br />The Plan will provide adequate lighting for streets and parking areas but without creating a <br />hazard for motorists or a nuisance for adjacent residential property owners. Any redevelopment <br />plan will require direct or directly reflected light to be confined to the property. Lights must be <br />equipped with hoods or louvers to direct light downward and prevent glare from crossing <br />property boundaries. Commercial uses must conform to hours of operation and noise levels <br />consistent with Roseville’s existing City Code. <br />DRAFT MAY 18, 2004 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.