My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-07-23_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-07-23_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2010 10:45:35 AM
Creation date
3/30/2010 10:45:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/23/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GRASS LAKE WATER MANAGEMENTN ORGANIZATION -JULY 23, 2009 7 <br />Grants are generally up to $5,000. <br />Eckman asked the cost for a study of Bennett Lake and the wetland. Sobiech answered, <br />between $7,000 and $10,000. <br />Ferrington suggested endorsing Scenario No. 14, which would include Nos. 2, 8 and 9. <br />This would focus on reducing curly leaf pond weed, provide for an alum treatment and <br />plan for the future reduction of phosphorous in the lake. <br />E-2 Request for Additional Budget <br />Sobiech stated that prior to the workshop meeting he prepared a cost table that breaks out <br />the original budget amounts and shows the items that went over cost and provided <br />descriptions. There was a lot of extra work to focus on in dealing with the complications <br />with the wetland as a source of phosphorous rather than a treatment mechanism. <br />Complex models had to be used to find out the amount of load coming out of the wetland <br />on an annual basis. This information had to be incorporated into the in-lake analysis. <br />That caused a longer report to discuss and explain this. Time for additional meetings was <br />included--the public meeting in April, and the workshop last month. The cost increase <br />for the additional work is $41,125.00. <br />Root moved, Westerberg seconded a motion to reimburse Barr Engineering $41,125.00 <br />for the additional work on the Lake Owasso Study. <br />Discussion: <br />Ferrington expressed concern about setting a precedent and asked what options there are <br />to address cost overruns in the future. It is complicated by the fact that the Board meets <br />only once every quarter. <br />Vote: Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Ferrington) <br />E-3 Proposal for Additional Work <br />Root stated that he would not be willing to support a Snail Lake Study next year. <br />MOTION: Eckman moved, Root seconded a motion to accept the proposal from Barr <br />Engineering that calls for the development of Lake Owasso UAA project synopsis and <br />attendance at public meetings. <br />Discussion: <br />Sobiech summarized the work in three tasks: 1) evaluation of a final Best Management <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.