My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-04-23_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
2009-04-23_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2010 10:58:39 AM
Creation date
3/30/2010 10:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/23/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GRASS LAKE WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION -APRIL 23, 2009 4 <br />time line can be used. When the money is gone, the grant is finished. There is a deadline <br />to encumber the money, which totals $150,000. <br />Chair Eckman noted a workshop on public engagement, Thursday, June 4, 2009, 8:30 to <br />noon at the Ramsey County Public Works site in Arden Hills sponsored by BWSR. <br />D-1 Lake Owasso Study Final Report/Recommendations <br />Presentation by Scott Sobiech, Barr Engineering <br />The water quality goal for Lake Owasso is 1.6 meters transparency. A reading of <br />2.45 meters transparency is the action level when steps are needed to address <br />water quality. In 2004 and 2005, the transparency reading exceeded the action <br />level, which triggered this study. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />(MPCA) standard is established by the average over a period of 10 years. <br />This study was approved for data collection in 2007. Because of the dry <br />conditions, the study was extended for data collection in 2008 to provide atwo- <br />year comparison. A scientific assessment was made of the physical, chemical and <br />biological conditions with the goal of finding what needs to be done to make the <br />lake usable for swimming. Seven steps were used for a lake use attainability <br />analysis: <br />1. Determine current and historical water quality conditions; <br />2. Set beneficial use goals; <br />3. Assess current watershed and use condition attainment or non-attainment <br />of the goals; <br />4. Estimate annual hydrologic and phosphorus budgets for the lake; <br />5. Reconcile the budgets to observed in lake conditions using a lake water <br />quality model; <br />6. Using the lake model calibrated to current conditions, assess the likelihood <br />of beneficial use attainment under ultimate (future) watershed land use <br />conditions; <br />7. If non-attainment is predicted for ultimate development conditions, <br />recommend feasible alternative remedial measures. <br />The study provides a monitoring summary of the following: <br />• Lake User Survey - 2007 <br />• Direct Discharges to Lake - 2007 <br />• Macrophyte Survey - 2007 <br />• Sediment Core Analysis - 2007 <br />• Runoff Water Quantity and Quality - 2007 and 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.