My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-01-24_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-01-24_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2010 11:47:45 AM
Creation date
3/30/2010 11:47:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GLWMO MINUTES <br />JANUARY 24, 2008 <br />PAGE 6 <br />These are preliminary results. He referred to the maps that showed the locations where <br />runoff was monitored, where water quality was monitored, and where sediment core <br />samples were taken. The southern location monitored for water quality is approximately <br />20 feet deep; the northern location is much deeper. The southern location showed higher <br />levels of concentration of phosphorous than the northern site. The northern site meets <br />GLWMO and MPCA goals for water quality; the southern site does not meet those <br />standards. One of the reasons for the high level of phosphorous at the southern site is the <br />presence of significantly more curly leaf pondweed. After mid-June, the sample showed <br />an increase in phosphorous at the time when pond leaf decays and releases phosphorous. <br />In the past year the northern part of the lake has experienced a significant drop in <br />phosphorous concentration because the summer was very dry and very little runoff was <br />let into the lake. <br />Although the Lake Association has treated the lake for milfoil, it has not targeted curly <br />leaf pondweed. Stark stated that the Board should meet with the Lake Association and <br />come to an agreement about treatment. <br />The levels of chlorophyll meet goals set by GLWMO, but the level at the northern site <br />does not meet MPCA standards for deep lake water quality. A trend analysis using <br />water quality data over the last 10 years shows that through the 1980s and 1990s, <br />phosphorous levels exceeded MPCA criteria. Levels of chlorophyll follow the same <br />trend. <br />Maloney stated that the perception of water quality depends on where residents live <br />because of the differences between sampling sites. He asked if it is typical to see this <br />wide a range of data between sites. Mr. Sobiech answered that it is typical. <br />Mogg asked the number of sites data is collected by Ramsey County and if there has been <br />a downward trend from 2005 to 2007. Sobiech answered that Ramsey County collects <br />data from one site. There has been a downward trend in phosphorous, an equitable trend <br />in chlorophyll and a flat trend in water transparency. <br />Aichinger noted that the MPCA uses samples over a period of 10 years to set impure <br />water standards. The last 10 years of samples from Lake Owasso show levels below <br />MPCA requirements. The algae concentration makes it difficult to determine turn-around <br />trends. Water transparency depth averages 1.6 meters, which is below several standards. <br />That was the reason for this study. <br />Mogg stated that the Board needs to state why the study is being done based on the data <br />presented and with the way the study plan was written and authorized. It is good that the <br />numbers are going down. He would like this study to reference the earlier diagnostic <br />feasibility report that was done in 1991 and tie the two reports together. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.