Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes/May 27, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br />that there was at least $6,000 in the GLWMO 2004 operating budget for someone <br />(staff, consultant) to perform these services. There was discussion and a desire of <br />the Board to have the cities do aself-assessment on the Report Card format that <br />had been previously developed. Board members agreed to familiarize themselves <br />with Chapter 6.0 of the Management Plan prior to the next meeting. In addition, <br />the Board wants to have recent water quality monitoring data for the WMO- <br />managed lakes forwarded from Terry Noonan (Ramsey County) if possible. <br />Regarding the Co-op Agreement, it was determined that the Board would pursue a <br />formal arrangement with RWMWD, and use the materials that Board Member <br />Brasch provided as a basis for a proposaUagreement, including estimate of <br />hours/budget and draft work plan. <br />Soderbeck moved to authorize the technical support staff to execute an <br />agreement with Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) <br />for services as generally described in the draft work program and to include <br />water sampling for both GLWMO and City managed water bodies for 2005, <br />DeZellar seconded. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0. <br />B-3 Revised Meeting Schedule <br />It was agreed to reschedule the next meeting from Thursday, June 17, to <br />Wednesday, June 16, 2004. The meeting will start at 5:00 PM. <br />B-4/5 Roseville/Shoreview Plans <br />There was discussion concerning support for the elements of the Roseville and <br />Shoreview Plans that dealt with the regional ponding philosophy, and the <br />potential interpretations for "pond dedication fees" whereby cities may accept <br />money from development/redevelopment entities for meaningful regional <br />approaches for water quality treatment in lieu of requiring site-specific <br />approaches. <br />DeZellar moved to direct Roseville and Shoreview to prepare letters to the <br />Board indicating that their Local Plans have been prepared in accordance <br />with the goals/policies of the GLWMO Plan, and to note any significant areas <br />of exception as well as exceedence. Soderbeck seconded. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0, <br />Board Member Brasch abstaining given the role of his employer (BRAA) in <br />assisting Roseville in the development of their Local Plan. <br />B-6 2005 Budget <br />The Board discussed the process for reviewing the 2005 Operating Budget in time <br />to provide input for Roseville's and Shoreview's Public Works Budgets, which <br />typically include allowances for GLWMO. The Board intends to review <br />