My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-10-26_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2000
>
2000-10-26_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2010 2:01:51 PM
Creation date
3/30/2010 2:01:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/26/2000
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. <br />B-2 Correspondence sent by the GLWMO since the June 8, 2000 meeting: <br />1. Terry Schwerm, City Manager, City of Shoreview, Environmental <br />Concerns - CP Rail/Cobra/Cardigan Junction Site, September 28, 2000. <br />REPORTS <br />C-1 Bills to be considered for payment <br />Stark moved approval of payment of the following bills: <br />1. Barr Engineering Company Invoice # 2362645-14 $2,755.54 <br />2. Barr Engineering Company Invoice # 2362645-15 $1,583.28 <br />TOTAL: $4,338.82 <br />Roessler seconded. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 <br />D. <br />OTHER BUISNESS <br />D-1 Review of Proposed 2001 Budget <br />The Board reviewed the proposed 2001 Budget. The tota12001 budget of <br />$66,500 contains the implementation items contemplated in the draft 2nd <br />generation plan. The Board continued final action on this item to the next regular <br />meeting. <br />D-2 Review of Barr Engineering Contract - GLWMO 2"d Generation Plan <br />The Board reviewed a memo from Karen Chandler that summarized the work <br />completed and budget for the 2"d Generation Plan. The memo estimated that <br />$31,000 beyond the original budget of $116,925 is needed to complete the <br />project. The Board discussed reasons for the cost overruns and relative liability. <br />Generally, it was felt that both the organization and Barr Engineering should <br />share in the cost of the $31,000 overrun. Staff will continue to negotiate with <br />Barr Engineering and bring a proposed budget resolution to the Board for <br />consideration at the next meeting. <br />E. ADJOURNMENT <br />Stark moved the meeting be adjourned at 6:10 p.m., Roessler seconded. <br />Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.