|
Summer/Fall 1995 WATER TALK Page 3
<br />...~ntlnued $om page 2
<br />References:
<br />Belt, C.B., 1975, The 1973 Flood and Mari s Constriction of the Mississippi River, Science, Vol 189,
<br />pp. 681-684.
<br />Galloyway, 1994, Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee, Sharing the Challenge-
<br />Floodplain Management into the 21st Century, 189p.
<br />Hanson K. and U. Lemanskt, 1995, Hard-earned Lessons from the Midwest Floods. River Voices,
<br />Vol 6(1), pp. 16-17.
<br />Illinois State Water Survey, 1992, Applications of Statistical Methods to the Study of Climate and
<br />Flooding Fluctuations in the Central United States, prepared for the USGS-Contract Report 523.
<br />Illinois State Water Survey, 1993, Influences of Wetlands on Streamflow in Illinois, Contract Report
<br />561.
<br />Knox, J.C., 1993, Large Increases in Flood Magnitude in Response to Modest Changes in Climate,
<br />Nature, Vol 361, pp. 430-432.
<br />Knox, J.C., 1988, Climatic Influence on the Upper Mississippi Valley Floods, Flood Geomorphology,
<br />Wiley, pp. 279-299.
<br />Knox, J.C., 1977, Human Impacts on Wisconsin Stream Channels, Annals of the Association of
<br />American Geographers, Vol 67(3), pp. 323-342.
<br />Robinson A. and R Marks, 1994, Restoring the Big River, Izaak Walton League and Natural
<br />Resources Defense Council, 53p. .
<br />Trimble, S.W. and S.W. Lund, 1982, Soil Conservation and the Reduction of Erosion and
<br />Sedimentation in the Coon Creek Basin, Wisconsin, Geological Survey Professional Paper 1234,
<br />35p.
<br />USES, 1993, Flood Discharges in the Upper Mississippi River Basing Circular 1120-A.
<br />
<br />fie work that provides the basis for this pubUcatlon was
<br />supported In part by funding under a cooperative
<br />agreement with the Federal Emergency Management
<br />Agency. The substance and findings of that work are
<br />dedicated to the public. The author and publisher are
<br />solely responsible for the occuracy of the statements and
<br />Interpretations contained In the publication. Such inter-
<br />pretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the
<br />federal Government
<br />This information !s available In an
<br />alternative format upon request.
<br />
<br />SHORELINE ECOSYSTEM
<br />® 50 feet 50 feet
<br />land water
<br />A natural
<br />shoreline
<br />ecosystcm needs
<br />native trees, shrubs,
<br />and wildflowers on the '
<br />land at feast 50 teat from
<br />the water's edge, and
<br />bulrushes, cattails, and
<br />submerged plants extending
<br />into the water from the sharelme.
<br />
|