My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1996-07-25_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1996
>
1996-07-25_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2010 4:22:15 PM
Creation date
4/12/2010 4:05:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/25/1996
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WCA ROAD REPLACEMENT REPORT -FINAL <br />YEAR: <br />PROJECT NAME OR NUMBER: <br />PROJECT TYPE: repair .rehabilitation reconstruction <br />LOCATION (attach map): <br />COUNTY: <br />ROAD AUTIiORITY NAME: <br />CONTACT PERSON: PHONE #: _ <br />TOTAL ESTIMATED WETLAND ACRES IMPACTED: <br />replacement <br />Y N 1.) WETLAND AVOIDANCE CHECKLIST (describe in item 4) COMMENTS <br /> Was the project relocated to avoid wetlands? <br /> Was the project reduced in scope to avoid wetlands? <br /> Did the project jeopardize or adversely effect endangered species? <br /> Did the project adversely affect cultural resources (SHPO)? <br /> Did the project. deviate from state and federal design standards to avoid wetlands? <br /> <br />Y N 2.) WETLAND MINIMIZATION CHECKLIST (describe in item 4) COMMENTS <br /> Was the project relocated to minimize impacts? <br /> Was the project reduced in scope to minimize imacts? <br /> Did the project incorporate best management practices to reduce impacts? <br /> Did the project include erosion control. and turf establishment plans? <br /> <br />Y N 3.) WETLAND MITIGATION CHECKLIST {describe in item 4) COMMENTS <br /> Will the project affect important wetland functions that require on-site replacement? <br /> Did the project have on-site replacement opportunities? <br /> Did the project have any replacement opportunities near by? <br /> Was some accomplished on-site or near by? <br /> Was all mitigation done off-site by a wetland bank (restoration)? <br />4.) DESRIPTION OP SEQUENCING (include attachment if needed): <br />~.) T.E.P. REVIEW: YES NO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.