Laserfiche WebLink
The Water SiilBoard <br />i~~ostly minor odifications: Reserve a ended <br />-This year's changes to the Reinvest in <br />Minnesota (RIiUQ Reserve program will <br />enable the program to more effectively treat <br />RLLI Reserve injor- water quality, soli erosion, and wildlife <br />oration: Tim Fredbo habitat in Minnesota. Such changes include: <br />51Z-296-0880 <br />Elimination of the minimum <br />eligible land parcel size for riparian <br />and wetland restoration conservation <br />easements. <br />Previously limited to ~ acres or a whole <br />field as defined by USDA, the change wiIi <br />promote whole basin wetland restoration <br />and support local priority conservation <br />easements. <br />Watershed districts gel <br />"powerful ne~v tool"- <br />stormlwater utility fees <br />The 1996 Legislature adopted legislation <br />amending the Watershed District Act. <br />Effective on August I, 1996, the amend- <br />ments authorize watershed districts to <br />establish stormwater utility fees. Districts <br />will. now have a powerful new tool to <br />finance stormwater quantity and quality <br />activities such as ditch management in <br />urbanizing areas and water quality improve- <br />ments. <br />J[Ormwater utility <br />gees, district per- <br />nizting or WMO <br />:njormation: your <br />area "s board con- <br />servationist or <br />:~oug Thomas <br />o ~ '-29 i-5617 <br />A stormwater utility fee is a service charge <br />based on a property's contribution ofwater <br />or pollutanu to the drainage system. or <br />receiving body ofwater. The fee is based on <br />the premise that the '`users pay" charges <br />based on the actual characteristics of <br />stormwater, this type offinancing system is <br />more equitable than ad valorem levies. and <br />is also administratively less expensive than <br />st~ecial assessments. <br />Water management districts/ <br />watershed district permitting <br />Other amendments to the Watershed <br />District Act allow watershed districts to <br />establish sub-areas within their boundaries <br />called "`Mater Management Districts," which <br />are necessary to define the taxing area for <br />projects within sub-watersheds. The act was <br />also amended so that the rules and regula- <br />tions of awatershed district apply to the <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation. <br />Elimination of the acreage cap on <br />the amount of land that can now be <br />enrolled by an individual landowner <br />into the RIM Reserve. <br />Previously enrollmentwas limited to 20 <br />percent of the average farm size in the <br />county. In many counties this is a very <br />small acreage and presented a problem on <br />high priority wetland restoration or riparian <br />easement applications. <br />The RIM Reserve is now a61e to <br />acquire flowage easements. <br />Such easements are important forwetland <br />restorarions involving adjacent landotivne:-s <br />who may be affected by the restored <br />wetland basin to a minor extent but may not <br />be interested in a perpetual~conservation <br />easement. By acquiring a ilowaQe easement <br />the project can stiII be completed. <br />BWSR can now accept <br />conservation and/or flowage <br />easements by ;ift or donation to the <br />State ofMinnesota. <br />Conservation practice payments to <br />landowners can. now be increased from <br />the previous 5144 per acre limit to <br />S244 per acre, when establishing <br />native prairie cover on an easement <br />area. <br />BWSR is now authorized to exceed. <br />conservation practice payment limits <br />with non-state funds. <br />Especially important on lame, costly <br />wetland restoration projects with high <br />engineering and construction costs, this <br />change promotes partnerships with local <br />clubs and o ~Qanizations, and helps local <br />governments address priority areas. <br />BWSR bodi>mg <br />Ri1YI <br />For the 199?-98 biennium, the RIM <br />Reserve together with the Permanent <br />Wetlands Preserve (PVUP} received SI 1.~ <br />million in state bonding funds, ~~+hich will <br />fund continued acquisition of conservation <br />easements and help to protect and restore <br />Minnesota's natural resources. <br /> <br />