Spring/Summer 1996 WATER TALK Page 5
<br />i ~ - ~, ~, ,y ~~ ~'" time was. 600 cubic feet per second (CFS)
<br />,~ ~ - ~ } ~- y~,~.= "~ less than 17 years earlier, when it reached
<br />`Y~' ~~.,~,"~'" ~` ' .. -.~'~`,. -~ 3 700 CFS.
<br />~ ~~ _ u''
<br />,. ' .
<br />_~ ~,~
<br />\t;h ..
<br />~ ~
<br />~: -
<br />-, '~
<br />~- -
<br />-. _ - f
<br />r~~
<br />Photo caurtesy of theWan•an Sheaf
<br />...cantinued from previous page
<br />~-,
<br />~.. --;,.
<br />.~ _
<br />t~
<br />~;
<br />(Later talk of that incident may have been the source
<br />of a persistent Honor -unfounded -that this bridge or
<br />one of the others in Warren had been destroyed by
<br />the flood.)
<br />Ron Adrian, engineer for the Middle River-
<br />Snake River Watershed District, says he has a theory
<br />as to why the Snake rose so quickly and to such
<br />surprisingly high levels. Adrian says the upstream
<br />drainage area had 4.5 inches of moisture on the
<br />ground prior to the flood. There was some snow
<br />melting in the days leading up to the flood, but
<br />temperatures were 10-15 degrees below normal,
<br />causing a slow melt. While water from melting snow
<br />on open fields moved toward the ditches, Adrian
<br />believes that snowmelt occurring on CRP land and in
<br />the woods was largely retained by the remaining
<br />unmelted snow, creating saturated snow in those
<br />areas.
<br />On Wednesday, April 17, 1996 the tempera-
<br />lure shot up to 65 degrees, causing remaining snow
<br />on the open fields to melt, creating the surge in Snake
<br />River levels that evening. The next day, the tempera-
<br />tures again reached 65 degrees, Adrian notes, unlock-
<br />ing the water retained. in woods and CRP and causing
<br />the second, more damaging surge in river levels
<br />beginning late Thursday night and culminating in the
<br />peak level of 851.7 feet beginning at 5 a.m. Friday.
<br />Comparisons between the 1979 Warren flood
<br />and the Flood of `96 are inevitable, beginning with
<br />the fact that they both began on April 18. The `96
<br />flood crested six tenths of a foot higher than the `79
<br />deluge. However, notes Adrian, the peak flow this
<br />A second, more severe flood hit
<br />Warren Saturday, May 18, 1996, leaving
<br />behind a far larger clean-up job than the
<br />spring snow-melt flood that swept into town
<br />exactly a month earlier. This second flood
<br />,~,,~ occurred 100 years to the day after another
<br />major rainstorm flood. The May 18 flood
<br />~, ~` resulted from heavy rains upstream on the
<br />w ~~ Snake River the evening of Thursday May
<br />16, 1996 and the night of Friday May 17,
<br />1996, producing a river crest of 853.7 feet,
<br />a full 2 feet higher than the crest of the April 18-19
<br />flood and within about half a foot of matching the
<br />flood of record in Warren.
<br />According to the Warren Shea}; the strongest
<br />part of the storm system reached Warren about 2:00
<br />a.m. Friday, bringing high winds and heavy rain.
<br />While 3.7 inches of rain was reported at Warren,
<br />levels of up to 6.25 inches fell west of Warren. In
<br />Warren, the Friday morning downpour sent the Snake
<br />River above the flood stage mark of 845 feet. That
<br />afternoon and evening, river levels went down,
<br />dropping about three feet from mid-afternoon to
<br />midnight. At midnight, however, the river level
<br />began climbing again, the result of local heavy rains
<br />that started about 9:00 p.m. Friday and runoff from
<br />the east moving downstream.
<br />Although the amounts of rain Friday night
<br />generally were less than. the night before, the heavy
<br />showers added 1-2 inches of additional moisture in
<br />the Snake River drainage. The river at Warren
<br />continued rising until cresting at 2 a.m. Sunday. City
<br />officials estimated 80-90 percent of the homes in
<br />Warren had some flood impact from. the May 18
<br />event. In most cases, damages were limited to
<br />partially or fully flooded basements, but the number
<br />of homes with water on the first floor was likely to be
<br />more than in the earlier flood.
<br />The City of Warren has considered flood
<br />control measures in the past. However, local opposi-
<br />tion and roughly 10 years without flooding had
<br />temporarily quieted discussion and support for such
<br />projects. The floods of 1996 have sparked a renewed
<br />interest in flood control, flood protection, and flood
<br />damage reduction projects for the City of Warren.
<br />
|