Laserfiche WebLink
Spring/Summer 1996 WATER TALK Page 5 <br />i ~ - ~, ~, ,y ~~ ~'" time was. 600 cubic feet per second (CFS) <br />,~ ~ - ~ } ~- y~,~.= "~ less than 17 years earlier, when it reached <br />`Y~' ~~.,~,"~'" ~` ' .. -.~'~`,. -~ 3 700 CFS. <br />~ ~~ _ u'' <br />,. ' . <br />_~ ~,~ <br />\t;h .. <br />~ ~ <br />~: - <br />-, '~ <br />~- - <br />-. _ - f <br />r~~ <br />Photo caurtesy of theWan•an Sheaf <br />...cantinued from previous page <br />~-, <br />~.. --;,. <br />.~ _ <br />t~ <br />~; <br />(Later talk of that incident may have been the source <br />of a persistent Honor -unfounded -that this bridge or <br />one of the others in Warren had been destroyed by <br />the flood.) <br />Ron Adrian, engineer for the Middle River- <br />Snake River Watershed District, says he has a theory <br />as to why the Snake rose so quickly and to such <br />surprisingly high levels. Adrian says the upstream <br />drainage area had 4.5 inches of moisture on the <br />ground prior to the flood. There was some snow <br />melting in the days leading up to the flood, but <br />temperatures were 10-15 degrees below normal, <br />causing a slow melt. While water from melting snow <br />on open fields moved toward the ditches, Adrian <br />believes that snowmelt occurring on CRP land and in <br />the woods was largely retained by the remaining <br />unmelted snow, creating saturated snow in those <br />areas. <br />On Wednesday, April 17, 1996 the tempera- <br />lure shot up to 65 degrees, causing remaining snow <br />on the open fields to melt, creating the surge in Snake <br />River levels that evening. The next day, the tempera- <br />tures again reached 65 degrees, Adrian notes, unlock- <br />ing the water retained. in woods and CRP and causing <br />the second, more damaging surge in river levels <br />beginning late Thursday night and culminating in the <br />peak level of 851.7 feet beginning at 5 a.m. Friday. <br />Comparisons between the 1979 Warren flood <br />and the Flood of `96 are inevitable, beginning with <br />the fact that they both began on April 18. The `96 <br />flood crested six tenths of a foot higher than the `79 <br />deluge. However, notes Adrian, the peak flow this <br />A second, more severe flood hit <br />Warren Saturday, May 18, 1996, leaving <br />behind a far larger clean-up job than the <br />spring snow-melt flood that swept into town <br />exactly a month earlier. This second flood <br />,~,,~ occurred 100 years to the day after another <br />major rainstorm flood. The May 18 flood <br />~, ~` resulted from heavy rains upstream on the <br />w ~~ Snake River the evening of Thursday May <br />16, 1996 and the night of Friday May 17, <br />1996, producing a river crest of 853.7 feet, <br />a full 2 feet higher than the crest of the April 18-19 <br />flood and within about half a foot of matching the <br />flood of record in Warren. <br />According to the Warren Shea}; the strongest <br />part of the storm system reached Warren about 2:00 <br />a.m. Friday, bringing high winds and heavy rain. <br />While 3.7 inches of rain was reported at Warren, <br />levels of up to 6.25 inches fell west of Warren. In <br />Warren, the Friday morning downpour sent the Snake <br />River above the flood stage mark of 845 feet. That <br />afternoon and evening, river levels went down, <br />dropping about three feet from mid-afternoon to <br />midnight. At midnight, however, the river level <br />began climbing again, the result of local heavy rains <br />that started about 9:00 p.m. Friday and runoff from <br />the east moving downstream. <br />Although the amounts of rain Friday night <br />generally were less than. the night before, the heavy <br />showers added 1-2 inches of additional moisture in <br />the Snake River drainage. The river at Warren <br />continued rising until cresting at 2 a.m. Sunday. City <br />officials estimated 80-90 percent of the homes in <br />Warren had some flood impact from. the May 18 <br />event. In most cases, damages were limited to <br />partially or fully flooded basements, but the number <br />of homes with water on the first floor was likely to be <br />more than in the earlier flood. <br />The City of Warren has considered flood <br />control measures in the past. However, local opposi- <br />tion and roughly 10 years without flooding had <br />temporarily quieted discussion and support for such <br />projects. The floods of 1996 have sparked a renewed <br />interest in flood control, flood protection, and flood <br />damage reduction projects for the City of Warren. <br />