Laserfiche WebLink
i der -agrees with `"anous but still for 300'. reflecting neighbors' opinions. Don't change if <br />there is no problem. Poor enforcement. better signage are concerns. <br />a('olfangle -favors 1~0' based on sheriff input. ask cit~• to contribute $ for increased patrol. <br />Old marina area is popular for fishing -should discourage fast boatslslalom there. Education, <br />signage at launch are needs. <br />~Tood - agrces with Gramer; favors 130', citt• contribution of $ for enforcement, user <br />education. Lake association can help educate. <br />Prok -supports Shoreview ord; enforcement should be bettor. 300' not enforced so traffic <br />won't change. ?Need special consideration of Ste' end (narrow. shallo«~). Supports education. <br />signage. <br />Stark -the 1~0' ordinance would promote safet<•; but concerned because panelists stated that <br />changing to 1~0' would negati~•elt• impact the ent•ironment. LOTF should make additional <br />recommendations to the council. Be careful to restrict ordinance change to Owasso. <br />?Members should keep an open mind at the 1 29 meeting (G~fi). <br />4. Other business. <br />LOTF needs to think about how to interact with Shoreview. alliances with Shoreview (e.g. <br />via the lake association) Lvould increase our influence and power to do good. The lake association <br />could expands its coverage of issues bet~ond «~eeds and geese (Da). <br />Next meeting is Tuesda~~ Jan. 14, 199 at citg• hall. for further planning and a "dry run" for <br />1-29. <br />5. adjourned. 9:43 P?~1 <br />handouts: <br />cit~~ petition: 1 1 X16-9~ (Egli) <br />P. Egli: secretary <br />1r13-'9~ <br />LOTFminutes 1/8%9~ 3 <br />