My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1997-05-01_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1997
>
1997-05-01_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 9:43:04 AM
Creation date
4/13/2010 8:42:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/1/1997
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lake Owasso Task Force <br />12/18/96 minutes <br />attending: Deane Anklan, Peggy Egli, John Gramer, Kate Linder, Sheila Prok. Jim Stark, Jim <br />Vanous, Gary' Wood, Steve North <br />absent: Betty Wolfangle <br />guests: environmental panel, below <br />chair. Gary Wood <br />meeting begun, 7:05 PM <br />1. Approval of minutes from 12/4/96. <br />The irunutes were unanimously approved. with the following correction: Kate Linder was present <br />on 12/4 and was absent on 11/13/96. <br />2. Environmental panel -task force questions. <br />Panelists: identifier <br />Ed Musielewicz -Natural Resources Conservation Service EM <br />Terry Noonan -Ramsey County Public Works Department TN <br />Tom Peterson -Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District TP <br />Joel Schilling -Short Elliot Henderson, Inc. JSch <br />Dave Zappetillo - DNR Metro Fishery DZ <br />1 . What effects do weed and algae control hay e on aquatic ~ egetation, shorelines, and purple Icx~sestrife? What <br />would be the effect nn aquatic vegetation, eater qualiq, and nay igable area if control was reduced to currently <br />recommended ]erel s? <br />DNR's division of Fish and Wildlife is responsible for plant management. Owasso treats 28%r <br />of its 247-A littoral area (s l5' depth), while current law allows on1}' 15%, so that 37 A is <br />"grandfathered" for weed control. The entire lake is 349 A., <br />Aquatic plants and algae require nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium) for growth. <br />Excess nutrients increase algal growth. The relative significance of external vs. internal nutrient <br />sources is hard to predict, but addressing the source (nutnent inputs) vs. the s}'mptom (undesired <br />weeds and algae) is the best approach to control. <br />Most herbicide treatment is done from 5/1 to 7/15. Timing is critical because the herbicides kill <br />by contact with vegetation. Early-season plants such as curly leaf pondweed normally die in June; <br />as some species die others emerge throughout the growing season to utilize released nutrients. The <br />August algal bloom is promoted by light, warmth, and release of nutrients from decomposing <br />rooted plants. In-lake weed control would not affect purple loosestrife. Aquatic plants are good <br />fish habitat but can be a hazard to boats or swimmers. -(DZ) <br />Owasso's aquatic vegetation is less abundant than many other county lakes. About 24 to 31% <br />of the lake (32-44% of the littoral area) has plants. Plant volume in the water column is 3-14%r in <br />summer. Most species diversity and growth through July is in the SW end; elsewhere, flat, <br />shallow-bottom areas contain mainly Chas, aloes-growing plant. Growth and species diversity <br />(corntail, native milfoil, lily, Chas) increase in the mid- and E-basins by Aug.-Sept.. It is <br />"unusual." that Owasso's shallow mid-basin. has so little plant cover. <br />Owasso and Johanna have the highest weed control in the county. Some county lakes are <br />100% littoral, covered with vegetation, but are still considered recreational lakes (E. Silver, <br />Island). Snail has open areas that have never been sprayed; White Bear and Snail are the clearest <br />lakes. -(TN) <br />2 . Discuss the relationship bet~~een turbidit}~, aquatic vegetation, and fish populations. <br />Fish populations were most recentl}' surveyed in 1996 but data are not yet available. Fish <br />populations vary over time with environmental conditions. <br />Most. Owasso fish are not impacted by turbidity (resuspended solids and/or algae). Walleye and <br />crappie like turbid water, muskie are sight feeders but tolerate some turbidit}', and large-mouth <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.