Laserfiche WebLink
Linder -agrees with ~'anous but still for 300'. reflecting neighbors' opinions. Don't change if <br />there is no problem. Poor enforcement. better signage are concerns. <br />olfangle - fac•ors 130' based on sheriff input. :ask cit~• to contribute S for increased patrol. <br />Old marina area is popular for fishing -should discourage fast boats/slalom there. Education: <br />signage at launch are needs. <br />C~'ood -agrees with Gramer; fa~•ors 1~0', citr contribution of ~ for enforcement, user <br />education. Lake association can help educate. <br />Prok -supports Shore~•ic~v ord; enforcement should be better. 300' not enforced so traffic <br />won't change. Need special consideration of Ste" end (narrow. shallow). Supports education: <br />siQnaQe. <br />Stark -the 1~0' ordinance would promote safet~•; but concerned because panelists stated that <br />changing to 1~0' would negati~•el~• impact the en~•ironment. LOTF should make additional <br />recommendations to the council. Be careful to restrict ordinance change to Owasso. <br />'Members should keep an open mind at the 1 29 meeting (G~t-). <br />4. Other business. <br />LOTF needs to think about how to interact with Shoreview. alliances with Shoreview (e. g. <br />via the lake association) would increase our influence and po~L•er to do good. The lake association <br />could expands its coverage of issues bet•ond weeds and geese (D:~). <br />Next meeting is Tuesdat• Jan. 14, 199- at cit}' hall. for further planning and a "dr~• run" for <br />1-29. <br />3. adjourned, 9:43 P'~1 <br />handouts: <br />citt• petition. 11!16~9~ (Egli) <br />P. Egli, secretar}• <br />L13~9- <br />LOTF minutes 1 %8%9- 3 <br />