Laserfiche WebLink
RECD ~4AR 1 3 1997 <br />!t'l17 <br />ter Soil <br />rCes <br />In this issue <br />BWSR page 10 <br />Information management, <br />SWCD election changes, <br />agency voting rights, ability <br />to accept grants <br />D1~1R page 11 <br />General permits for county <br />projects, PWI maps, general <br />permits for water <br />apporpriations <br />PCA page 12 <br />ISTS <br />MDH page 13 <br />SDWA, well management, <br />plumbing, health risk limits <br />MN Plan page 15 <br />Wastewater needs, <br />Crosscurrents <br />The Water Bi1lBoard <br />is an interagency information source for current environmental legisla- <br />tion. It is published twice a year by the Minnesota Board of Water and <br />Soil Resources. <br />March 1997 Vol. 9, no. 1 <br />From all a encies <br />Interagency water iiiatve ro ose <br />The environmental cluster agen- <br />cies have banded together to <br />support a number of interagency <br />environmental initiatives this <br />legislative session. The cluster <br />agencies are: <br />• the Minnesota Board of Water <br />and Soil Resources (BWSR) <br />• the Minnesota Department of <br />Natural Resources (DNR) <br />• the Minnesota Department of <br />Health (MDH) <br />® the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency (MPCA); and <br />• the Minnesota Department of <br />Agriculture (MDA). <br />Good water monitoring provides <br />the foundation for protecting <br />Minnesota's invaluable water <br />resources. Done well, water <br />monitoring provides us with the <br />basic information needed to <br />identify, evaluate, and then solve <br />our water resource problems. <br />Carefully thought-out and <br />implemented, the data provided by <br />water monitoring acts as an <br />essential guide, allowing us to <br />make considered decisions as to <br />the most effective direction for our <br />actions. In a time of limited <br />financial resources, it is an <br />essential tool for ensuring that <br />available dollars are targeted <br />where they will do the most <br />good. <br />The 1992 Minnesota Water <br />Monitoring Plan, an interagency <br />effort coordinated by the <br />Minnesota Environmental Quality <br />Board, reaffirmed the vital. role of <br />good water monitoring. The <br />plan examinedthen-current <br />efforts and appropriate roles of <br />the different agencies, identified <br />needed improvements, and set <br />out a framework for building a <br />strong, coordinated, and <br />comprehensive program for <br />monitoring the state's waters. <br />This 1997 interagency initiative <br />builds on that plan. Since 1992, <br />state agencies have made <br />significant improvements in what <br />they monitor. Likewise, we have <br />changed how we monitor, in <br />order to make monitoring more <br />cost-effective and provide more <br />useable results to state and local <br />decision-makers. <br />