My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-02-04_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1999
>
1999-02-04_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 12:05:50 PM
Creation date
4/13/2010 12:05:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/4/1999
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~,® <br />1, <br />~J <br />GRASS LAKE WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION <br />AGENDA ITEM <br />Date: 2/4/1999 Prepared by: Karl Keel Item: C-1 <br />Reports <br />Item Description: Request for Qualifications-2"d Generation Plan <br />The proposed 1999 GLWMO budget includes funds to prepare a 2nd Generation Watershed <br />Management Organization Plan. This plan, required by the Metropolitan Surface Water Management <br />Act, is considered by many to be the most important document of a watershed management <br />organization. In addition to a comprehensive inventory of water resources, a Watershed Management <br />Organization Plan articulates the goals and objectives of the organization as well as sets operating <br />policies that are used in the day to day management of water resources. <br />At the January 28, 1999 meeting, the board agreed to rank each of the following five firms with <br />regard to their RFQs. Each member and staff were to utilize their own criteria and to be prepared to <br />justify their individual ranking. <br />• Barr Engineering Company, Minneapolis <br />• Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., St. Paul <br />• Howard R. Green Company, St. Paul <br />• Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc., St. Paul <br />• WSB and Associates, Inc., Minneapolis <br />RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: <br />It is recommended that each Board Member and Staff discuss their individual consultant ranking. <br />Following the discussion, individual rankings should be compiled in an effort to select one consultant. <br />If the Board finds it difficult to decide between multiple consulting firms or would like additional <br />information, presentations from top ranking firms can be arranged. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.