Laserfiche WebLink
RESEARCH ~i DEVELOPMENT RANKING CRITERIA <br />1999 <br />CRITERIA 3. GOOD 2. SATISFACTORY 1. POOR <br />1. Overall strength of Project is well thought Project seems Project raises unanswered <br />proposal. out and seems likely reasonable and may questions and seems unlikely <br /> to succeed. succeed. to succeed. <br /> 6 is 4 is 1 t <br />2. Overall strength of Proposal gives good Proposal identifies Proposal does not include or <br />project timeline. definition of activities, activities, timeline and is unclear on activities, <br /> timeline and responsible party. timeline and responsible <br /> res onsible art . art . <br />3. Overall total project Matching amount is Matching amount is 25- Matching amount is <25% of <br />cost and matching amount. greater than 50% of 50% of total project total project cost. <br /> total ro'ect cost. cost. <br />4. Addresses recognized Fulfills unmet Adds to small amount of Concept already well <br />research needs. research needs. existing research. researched. <br />5. Ability of project to Project will provide Project will provide new Project is unlikely to provide <br />provide new information. new information using information and requires new information. <br /> ~xistir~b data ~r'YViti1 ~;~tensi~e data <br /> limited data collection. <br /> collection. <br />6. Project addresses Project addresses a Project addresses a less Project addresses a specific <br />pollutant reduction goals. common situation and common situation, but situation and is unlikely to <br /> is applicable state- may be applicable to be of wide spread <br /> wide. other sites in the metro application. <br /> area. <br />