Laserfiche WebLink
To: Grass Lake Water Management Organization <br />From: Denny Palmer, Karen Chandler, Hal Runke <br />Subject: Work Plan--GLWMO Water Management Plan <br />Dateā€¢ September 27 1999 Paae 2 <br />preparation. For those lakes and water bodies where data are currently unavailable, the WMO <br />Plan will recommend data collection and modeling activities necessary to fill information gaps, but <br />completion of such studies during the term of the Plan preparation is not feasible, given financial <br />and time constraints. <br />1.1 Inventory and classify wetlands and water bodies <br />1.1.1 Identify the wetlands, water bodies, streams, and conveyances to be managed by the <br />GLWMO, and identify on a base map of the GLWMOhydrologic system. The map will <br />also identify direct discharges into wetlands and other water bodies, and in-place best <br />management practices (i.e. grit chambers, ponds), to the extent the electronic <br />information is provided by the cities to Barr. Work scope assumes no field verification of <br />map information, and that GLWMO cities will provide ArcView files to Barr; minimal <br />editing will be required by Barr. <br />1.1.2 Establish a classification system founded in the systems of member communities and <br />based on desired use or function, resource type, and public exposure (i.e access, parks, <br />trails). Classification system will include general range of water quality criteria, where <br />appropriate. <br />1.1.3 Propose a classification for each water body and wetland in accordance with the selected <br />classification system, based on desired public use, and test the proposed classifications <br />with the GLWMO Board. GLWMO Board staff to test the proposed classifications with <br />the communities by presentations to the Environmental Quality Committee(Shoreview), <br />the Planning Commission (Shoreview, Roseville), .and the Park and Recreation Board <br />(Shoreview, Roseville); Barr to prepare presentation materials. <br />1.1.4 Establish specific water quality, management or other goals based on existing standards <br />published by jurisdictional agencies, such as the MDNR, MPCA, Metropolitan Council, <br />or interagency working groups. <br />1.2 Determine existing condition of wetlands and water bodies <br />1.2.1 Evaluate the adequacy of existing data for determining whether managed resources <br />meet established goals for existing conditions. <br />1.2.2 Where adequate data exist, compare existing conditions with classification and goals for <br />each managed water body or wetland; determine whether goals are met for existing <br />conditions. Wetland analysis will be based on available flood level information. <br />1.2.3 Where adequate data do not exist, determine data to be collected and develop data <br />collection plan for affected resources. Collection of the data is not included in this work <br />scope for development of the WMP. The data collection effort will be included as a <br />WMP implementation activity, as will the subsequent parts of the assessment, described <br />in paragraphs 1.3 and 1.4. <br />1.3 Estimate future water quality conditions <br />1.3.1 Estimate future water quality conditions using existing data or existing models for <br />managed water bodies and wetlands. Existing models means spreadsheet modeling, not <br />