My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-10-28_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1999
>
1999-10-28_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 3:24:10 PM
Creation date
4/13/2010 3:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/28/1999
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
meadows, shallow marshes, and deep marshes. Least susceptible wetlands include gravel pits, <br />cultivated hydric soils, and dredged material/fill material disposal sites. The document then <br />recommends standards for storm bounce, discharge rate, inundation periods, and run-out control, <br />based on these classifications. <br />Other cities and WMOs in the metro area have developed wetland classification systems based on the <br />advisory group's recommendations. For example, the city of Minnetonka classifies wetlands into the <br />categories of Preserve, Manage 1, Manage 2, and Utilize, based on their susceptibility. Wetland <br />management standards apply to each classification, according to the wetland's susceptibility and <br />management potential. Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) also classifies <br />wetlands in a similar manner. <br />Proposed Wetland Classification Systerr>s <br />The proposed GLWMO wetland classification system uses the same categories as the Minnetonka <br />plan and the RWMWD plan. The `x"` cities will use this classification system to classify <br />wetlands. '','~~~° •-~°+'~~,a~ ~~+ ~'~~~;~;°,a ~.~, rr ~x~ran ~Uetlands will be classified and managed by the <br />affected city. The proposed wetland categories and their associated characteristics are as follows: <br />• A -Protect: High quality natural basins, unique habitats, rare/threatened/endangered species,, <br />high quality adjacent uplands <br />• B - High Management ~Ia~go-~: Moderate to high quality basins, some receive direct <br />stormwater, high quality adjacent uplands <br />C -Low Management Ma-~: Highly impacted to moderately quality natural basins, most <br />receive direct stormwater, low diversity or monotypes <br />® D -Utilize: Created basins, highly impacted natural basins, isolated monotypes <br />Wetland l~lanagemerat <br />Since the cities of Shoreview and Roseville (not GLWMO) are the local governmental units <br />responsible for administering the Wetland Conservation Act, GLWNIO will not seek to ma»a.~e <br />wetlands ~ The member cities <br />may request that the GLWMO manage certain wetlands; the GLWMO Board «i11 decideon acase- <br />by-case basis if such wetlands should he managed by the WM0 GL~1%MO's'overall role'n wetland <br />C:\TEMP\wetland_class.doc Page 2 10/22/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.