My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-10-28_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1999
>
1999-10-28_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 3:24:10 PM
Creation date
4/13/2010 3:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/28/1999
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Category IV -Nutrient Traps <br />No numeric standards for water quality parameters are defined for this category. Water bodies in this <br />category are intended to reduce downstream loading of phosphorus and other nutrients that contribute to <br />water pollution. These ponds are generally artificially modified to improve their nutrient trapping <br />capacity. These ponds may become hypereutrophic, and frequent summer algal blooms would be <br />considered normal. These ponds are designed to have phosphorus removal efficiencies of at least ~0% <br />and the depth of these ponds should be managed to prevent or reduce odors associated with algal <br />blooms. <br />Category V -Sediment Traps <br />These water bodies are similar to category IV water bodies, but are too small to effectively remove a <br />significant fraction of nutrients. These basins will generally have phosphorus removal efficiencies of <br />50%. <br />A~lar~l~ l~~aiet• bo~/re,,~ ia~ill trot be ~rrai~cr~d by tla~ C~Lr1,1-~0, el~ef~ th~~t~gh theymrr~~ heclnt~s~i~rec~n <br />accorda~~ce tivitl~ these GL i~MO categories. The GI_WMO Board will deslgt~ate those ~raler bodies tivrth <br />tii~hich the UL1~rMU titi-ill be directly irwolved. Othef•.;~ tii~ill be mai~a~c~d big the cotes to achieve both the <br />I~%l~> '.t~ goals and the cities 'goals. <br />V11M0-IVlanaged Water Bodies anc!'Application ®f Gtassifacati®n system <br />WMO-managed water bodies are those waters determined b~~ the GLWNIO Board to have broad <br />watershed significance; they are important to a`larger population rxar~ than just the municipalities in <br />which they are located. The WMO will c(assify~ WMO-managed water bodies ~~°~" "° °'°°~~~°~' <br />°°~d i~n.~ ~o based oil their existing water quality, takinginto accounttheir use, and/or the presence of <br />ecologically or biologically unique resources, according to irs-i-n~g the proposed classification system. <br />This preliminary classificationmav be revised, based on existing and desired usesofthe ~~daterbodie;s <br />and thG projUCted future eater duality of the water- bodies: ~Fh~~~ill~~eall°~' +r,° `'°,,:~+;,,,. <br />^~^~~~~^^+~^~ " The WMO will set manage»tentclassification based on ~~heth~r T~° ~xraan ..,;n +r.,,~ <br />°°~' +° a°*°~~~~° ~~the water bodies should be managed to maintain or improve their water quality.- <br />« >, <br />Table 1 illustrates the implications of WMO management of water bodies and the respective rolesof the <br />Wlvl® and the cities in «-titer quality tasks, <br />Grass_lake_class_system Page 4 10/22/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.