My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-10-28_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
199x
>
1999
>
1999-10-28_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 3:24:10 PM
Creation date
4/13/2010 3:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/28/1999
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GRASS LAKE WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION <br />AGENDA ITEM <br />Date: 10/28/99 <br />Prepared by: Karl Keel <br />Item: A-2 <br />Organizational Items <br />Item Description: Board Membership Discussion <br />At the September 16, 1999 meeting, the Board requested a review of Board membership and possible <br />changes to eliminate the practice of alternating the fifth Board seat between Roseville and Shoreview. A <br />copy of the joint powers agreement between the cities of Roseville and Shoreview that formed the <br />organization in 1983 was distributed. Section III on page 4 outlines the makeup of the Board. <br />In past discussions the Board has expressed concern about the potential lack of Board continuity as the 2°`~ <br />generation plan is developed and implemented. If the Board consisted of an even number of members <br />evenly appointed from each city, there would not be a need to alternate a fifth member. Such a change <br />would require a modification to the joint powers agreement and would require the approval of both the <br />Roseville and Shoreview City Councils. <br />At the October 7, 1999 meeting, the board discussed an option whereby Shoreview would appoint an <br />existing member from Roseville. The existing joint powers agreement does not require a cities <br />appointment to be from the same city. If Shoreview agreed to appoint a Roseville member in 2000 and <br />Roseville agreed to appoint a Shoreview member in 2001, the existing board membership could stay the <br />same through 2001 -enough time to complete the 2°d generation plan. If the Board favored this solution, <br />it should make a formal request to the Shoreview and Roseville City Councils. <br />RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: <br />Board discussion regarding the merits and disadvantages of changing the Board's composition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.