My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-01-06_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2000
>
2000-01-06_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2010 9:14:50 AM
Creation date
4/14/2010 9:09:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/6/2000
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
also make an in-kind or a monetary contribution to the development and maintenance of <br />community storm water management facilities designed to serve multiple land disturbing <br />and development activities undertaken by one or more persons, including the applicant. <br />B.) All calculations and hydrologic models/information used in determining peak flows <br />Must be submitted along with the storm water pollution control plan; <br />C.) The applicant shall consider reducing the need for storm water management facilities by <br />incorporating the use of natural topography and land cover such as natural swales and <br />depressions as they exist before development to the degree that they can accommodate the <br />additional flow of treated (e.g., settled) water without compromising the integrity or quality <br />of the wetland or pond. (Commentary: The sensitivity of a wetland to degradation varies <br />with the type of vegetation. Sedge meadows, open bogs and swamps, coniferous bogs, <br />calcareous fens, low prairies, lowland hardwood swamps, and seasonally flooded basins <br />are highly sensitive to degradation, while flood plain forests, reed canary grass meadows, <br />shallow (reed canary grass, cattail, giant reed or purple loosestrife) marshes are only <br />slightly sensitive to degradation. See the current version of the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency's publication "Storm-Water and Wetlands: Planning and Evaluation <br />Guidelines for Addressing Potential Impacts of Urban Storm-Water and Snow-Melt Runoff <br />on Wetlands "for details.) <br />D.) The following storm water management practices must be investigated in developing <br />the storm water management part of the storm water pollution control plan in the following <br />descending order of preference: <br />1.) Protect and preserve as much natural or vegetated area on the site as possible, <br />minimizing impervious surfaces, and directing runoff to vegetated areas rather than to <br />adjoining streets, storm sewers and ditches. <br />2.) Flow attenuation by use of open vegetated swales and natural depressions; <br />3.) Storm water wet detention facilities (including percolation facilities); and <br />4.) A combination of successive practices may be used to achieve the applicable <br />minimum control requirements specified in subsection (A) above. The applicant shall <br />provide justification for the method selected. <br />6.6 Minimum Design Standards for Storm Water Wet Detention Facilities. These facilities <br />must conform to the most current technology as reflected in the current version of the Miiiriesota <br />Pollution Control Agency's publication, "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" and the <br />current requirements found in the same agency's NPDES permits for storm water associated <br />with construction activities. <br />6.7 Minimum Protection for Natural Wetlands. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.