Laserfiche WebLink
• Is Lake Wabasso still associated with the Lake Owasso Association? If so, why is Lake Wabasso not <br />`managed?' <br />• We do a once-a-year cleanup at fishing access and general area at the SW end of the lake. There are many <br />bottles and cans in the reeds and lots of broken glass on shore. I hope the trash can that's now there will be of <br />some help -but probably not for stuff in reeds. It would be great to clean the tires & junk out of the pond by <br />the RR tracks. <br />• I flunk the volunteers that patrol our lake have done a good job. <br />• Keep up the good work. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. <br />SUMMARY (of SITUATION ANALYSIS) <br />Lake Owasso is an intensely managed and highly manipulated lake -especially compared to most other metro lakes. <br />As well, there have been trends noted in water quality indicators over the past 25 to 30 years. Management <br />activities, manipulations and natural occurrences in Lake Owasso include: <br />Water Level <br />^ A half century of pumping (discontinued in 1991) <br />^ Outlet structures <br />^ Natural variations in lake level <br />Fluctuations and Trends in Water Quality <br />^ Fluctuating nutrient levels, decreasing trend in the 1990s <br />^ Fluctuating algae levels, decreasing trend in the 1990s <br />^ Fluctuating water clarity, increasing trend in the 1990s <br />^ A significant improvement in algae abundance and water clarity in 1998 & 1999 <br />^ The implementation of stormwater basins in the 1990s <br />Aquatic Plants <br />^ Shifts in plant species <br />^ 40 years of control, including switching contractors in 1997 - 1999 <br />Fish <br />^ Intensive stocking of muskellunge and walleye <br />^ Winter aeration <br />^ Removal of muskellunge for stocking other lakes <br />^ Frequent winterkill conditions <br />Recreational Use <br />^ Tripling of recreational watercraft use (1974 to 1994) <br />^ Tripling of angling pressure (1974 to 1994) <br />Given the intensity of management efforts as well as the fluctuating conditions, it makes sense to assure all agencies <br />and other parties are working in concert for file total management of Lake Owasso. <br />Lake Owasso is a shallow lake that benefits from die `shallow lake bonus' meaning that the water is very clear <br />compared to other lakes with similar phosphorus levels. The reason for dus is associated with abundant native <br />aquatic plants that inhabit a large portion of the lake. Normally, there are two management approaches that are <br />appropriate for shallow lakes: a) maximizing aquatic plant control to provide for active recreation and b) <br />maximizing aquatic plant protection to keep the `shallow lake bonus.' The pros and cons for each approach are <br />listed in Appendix A. <br />Discussions with the Executive Committee of the Lake Owasso Association reviewed these two approaches. The <br />Lake Owasso Association feels that their management history reflects a balanced approach because they have not <br />always controlled aquatic plants to the maximum level allowed by MN DNR rule. It was the consensus of the group <br />drat Lake Owasso could be managed for active recreation in recognition of the fact drat die main risks associated <br />with aquatic plant controls (ie. increased risk of milfoil infestation and murky water) have not been realized. In <br />