My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001-08-23_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2001
>
2001-08-23_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2010 3:02:34 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 2:56:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/23/2001
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B d~SR SO-day draft Platt Corrrrrrents Drat BWS~Z 4J-day clr•aff Pl <br />Wi <br />l C <br /> un <br />rra <br />orrr~~tertts <br /> Section <br /> o Paae <br /> <br /> profit organization membership would for the more complicated/ controversial <br /> improve an already strong committee. projects in the watershed. <br /> Plan should explore how GLWMO <br /> will integrate with the Shoreview and <br /> Roseville Environmental Management <br /> Committees. <br />This section could emphasize what 5.8 Plan should contain a short analysis of <br />other GW management programs are activities defined in the Ramsey Co~~nty <br />doing and your strategy to partner in Groundwater Protection Plan and if those <br />their programs. activities are compatible with the GLWMO <br /> goals. <br />How will the District identify and <br />regulate protection of sensitive <br />groundwater areas? <br />More detail is needed to explain the 5.5 The Wetland protection acid management <br />GLWMO's management intentions ordinance could be included in the <br />related to priority areas, review of "package" of local controls required from <br />WCA applications, locations of the GLWMO "report card". This local <br />mitigations, functional and value ordinance could provide management <br />assessments, volume conservation, flexibility in pursuing water quality and <br />buffer requirements, and management quantity goals in high priority waterbodies. <br />of "protect" wetlands. A <br />comprehensive wetland plan could be <br />the vehicle to create an overlay district <br />to be implemented by the cities or <br />GLWMO. <br />Rather than the 10-year planning 6.2 The BWSR looks forward to receiving the <br />cycle, create an annual or biennial GLWMO annual and financial report <br />cycle to review and update the CIP incorporating results ofthe report card and <br />and implementation needs.. Perhaps, any necessary changes in the <br />making it part of the annual reporting implementation strategy. <br />process. <br />You are to be commended for all the work you have done over the last year developing the final draft Plan. <br />We are looking forward to assisting you through the final stages of the Plan review process. If you have any <br />questions or would like to discuss these comments further, please contact me at 651-297-8026. <br />Si rely .~ - <br />Phil Belfiori <br />Board Conservationist <br />Minnesota Board of Water/Soil Resources <br />PJB/da <br />CC: Steve Woods, BWSR (file copy) Marcel Jouseau, Met.Council Betty Wheeler, MDH <br />Dale Homuth, MDNR Metro Region Gene Soderbeck, MPCA Mark Zabel, MDA <br />F:\Projects\Phil\GRASSLA\45 day review.doc 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.