Laserfiche WebLink
Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Takes Stronger Focus <br />on Watershed Management Issues <br />The LMRWD covers approximately a 70 <br />square mile area that mostly follows the <br />bluff tines of the Minnesota River from <br />the Carver Rapids to the confluence with <br />the Mississippi River. The Lower <br />Minnesota River Watershed District <br />(LMRWD) was formed in 1960, with an <br />original purpose to be the local sponsor <br />for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to <br />assist in the maintenance of a navigation <br />channel on the lower reaches of the <br />Minnesota River. <br />Over the past two years, the LMRWD <br />has made major efforts to increase its <br />focus toward watershed and water <br />resources management by adopting an <br />updated Lower Minnesota River Water- <br />shed District Watershed Management <br />Plan and hiring a full time District <br />Administrator. The plan continues its <br />original purpose of serving as the local <br />sponsor to the U.S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers, but also outlines a plan to <br />establish partnerships and build collabo- <br />rative efforts to manage the unique <br />resources of the LMRWD. Among the <br />unique resources found in the LMRWD <br />are 7state-designated trout streams, 4 <br />calcareous fens, and numerous flood <br />plain lakes and wetlands. <br />The LMRWD has recently made several <br />efforts toward implementing their new <br />watershed management plan. First, the <br />LMRWD has initiated a partnership with <br />the U.S Geological Survey to conduct a <br />floodplain redefinition study. This is the <br />first study of the Lower Minnesota River <br />floodplain in almost 30 years. The <br />purpose of the study is to evaluate the <br />Lower Minnesota River's floodplain and <br />produce new maps of the River from <br />Carver Rapids to its confluence with the <br />Mississippi River. The new maps will <br />assist in planning and zoning activities, <br />including new Flood Insurance Studies. <br />only a handful of trout streams that <br />remain in the Twin Cities Metropolitan <br />Area and the Seminary Fen is one of the <br />highest quality calcareous fens in the <br />area (See the .Seminary Fen Protection <br />Efforts article). The project, partially <br />funded by the MN DNR Greenway <br />Planning Grant, is a collaborative effort <br />among the LMRWD, MNDNR, the City <br />of Chanhassen, Friends of the Minnesota <br />Valley, Minnesota Land Trust, the <br />Conservation Fund, local residents, and <br />others. The effort will result in a series <br />of educational workshops for local <br />residents and city officials and a stew- <br />ardship and protection plan for Assump- <br />tion Creek and Seminary Fen. <br />The LMRWD is also involved in another <br />fen and trout stream protection effort <br />with the City of Eagan and the Gun Club <br />Lake Watershed Management Organiza- <br />tion. This project, also funded by a <br />Greenway Planning Grant, will. involve <br />collecting and analyzing maps, stream <br />information, and the development of a <br />Geographic Information System (GIS) of <br />two trout streams and a fen complex- <br />The information will then be used to <br />begin the development of a management <br />and protection plan for the area. <br />The Lower Minnesota River Watershed <br />District will continue to establish itself <br />as a leader in the restoration and protec- <br />tion of the Minnesota River. As the <br />LMRWD implements it's Watershed <br />Management Plan, it will continue to <br />focus on establishing strong partnerships <br />and collaborative efforts to protect the <br />resources of the Lower Minnesota River. <br />The LMRWD has also initiated a local <br />watershed planning project for the <br />Assumption Creek/Seminary Fen <br />watershed. Assumption Creek is one of <br />uic stars etan Conservation Act <br />proposed rules role sic <br />On October 10th the DNR released it's draft Public Waters proposed rules and <br />BWSR released it's draft proposed WCA rules for stakeholder comment. A copy <br />of the WCA proposed rules (159 pages) has been circulated to watershed districts <br />and our partners via e-mail. A copy of the Public Waters proposed rules will be <br />available electronically the last week in October and will be circulated at that <br />time. (Contact the MAWD office if you haven't received your copies). <br />Individual drainage authorities should review these proposed rules very closely <br />and forward any comments you may have to the MAWD Office. MAWD is <br />reviewing the drafts for comment at this time and will be alerting watershed <br />districts on the negative impacts of these rules. <br />Three immediate concerns regarding this duel rulemaking process include: <br />* Repair of existing public drainage should not be interfered with by the DNR <br />and other state regulatory agencies without explicit authority. <br />* The statewide policy change requiring drainage repairs to comply with WCA <br />(25 year rule) is a policy change that should be discussed as a matter of state law, <br />not DNR rule. This major drainage policy shift should not be done through the <br />back door by DNR rulemaking. <br />* We need to examine very closely the BWSR's proposed WCA rules, especially <br />those relating to WCA exemptions. <br />These rules are expected to be published in the State Register in mid-November. <br />MAWD will keep you up-to-date on the details of these rule changes after <br />additional review and analysis. <br />12 <br />