Laserfiche WebLink
`:~ <br /> <br />Lj Lake Watershed, is proposed to be treated in one of two alternative ponds under consideration on <br /> the Chippewa Middle School property. One alternative location is on the East Side of the property, <br /> and would have a surface area of approximately 027 hectares (0.67 acres) and permanent pool <br />storage volume of 2,775 cubic meters (2.25 acre-feet). This pond location would. also <br /> accommodate stormwater runoff from the school property. The second alternative location is on <br /> the West Side of the property next to Highway 49, and would have a surface area of approximately <br />~, 0.22 hectares (0.54 acres) and permanent pool storage volume of 2,110 cubic meters (I.71 acre- <br />i`-~ feet). The removal efficiencies for both alternative pond locations meet National Urban Runoff <br /> Program (NURP) standards. Both pond alternatives would discharge through the Red Maple <br />r,, Marsh-Blue Water Marsh system to Pleasant Lake. <br />stormwater from the subwatershed between Highway 96 and Tanglewood Drive (Drainage area <br />3A&B on Figure 7), which lies in the Grass Lake Watershed, is proposed to be treated in an <br />existing stormwater pond located behind the Rainbow Foods Store north of Highway 96. This <br />pond would be enlarged to have a surface area of 0.13 hectares (0.31 acres) and permanent pool <br />storage volume of 1,949 cubic meters (1.58 acre-feet). The existing stormwater pond has removal <br />efficiencies of 76.5% for total suspended solids and 48.0% for total phosphorous. The enlarged <br />pond would have slightly increased removal efficiencies, 77.6% for total suspended solids and <br />48.7% for total phosphorous. These removal efficiencies, both for the existing and enlarged ponds, <br />do not meet NURP standards of 90% for total suspended solids and 60% for total phosphorous, <br />but with the limited space available, it is not considered feasible to construct a pond large enough <br />to meet full NURP standards. This pond discharges through a series of wetlands to Grass Lake. <br />The subwatershed south of Highway 96 (Drainage area 1 on Figure 7), which is part of the Grass <br />Lake Watershed, would be treated in an existing stormwater pond west of Bridge Street and <br />Highway 49. The berm enclosing this pond would be rebuilt to its original design elevation, <br />resulting in a pond with a surface area of 0.15 hectares (0.37 acres) and a permanent pool storage <br />volume of 1,234 cubic meters (1.00 acre-feet). The removal efficiencies for this pond would meet <br />f National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. This pond discharges through a series of <br />wetlands to Grass Lake. <br />Capacity and water quality requirements for the storm sewer systems are under the authority of the <br />municipalities and the watershed management organizations according to their stormwater <br />management plans. <br />Additional detail regarding storm water tributary areas and specific ponding locations is included <br />in the "Highway 49 Project Development Report (July, 2000)". <br />18. Water quality: wastewaters <br />a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and iiul~sstrial wastewater <br />produced or treated at the site. <br />None. <br />~° b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of <br />composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, <br />and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on-site <br />sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. - <br />None. <br />c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe <br />any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition <br />of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. <br />