My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-08-14_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
2003-08-14_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2010 8:25:50 AM
Creation date
4/15/2010 8:14:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/14/2003
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />a <br />EXECUTIVE SUMIVIARY <br />Twin Lake was studied to formulate management guidelines to reduce flood potential and protect <br />water quality for the lake. The effect of possible flows from Vadnais Lake was also evaluated. <br />Although water quality and water level data is scarce for Twin Lake, several conclusions resulted from <br />this study. <br />Water quality in Twin Lake is above average for the Twin Cities area, and the lake should remain <br />isolated to preserve its trophic status. Overflow from Vadnais Lake into Twin Lake is normally <br />prevented by the Saint Paul Water Utility's management of water levels in Vadnais Lake. If this <br />situation should change, the water quality of Twin Lake would likely suffer. Likewise, any outlet to <br />~ the County Ditch 16 system should protect against backflow to Twin Lake. <br />A 1975 report suggested that 63 cfs flood flow may need to be directed from Vadnais Lake <br />through Twin Lake; present I-694 culverts downstream of Twin Lake could not accommodate a flow <br />greater than about 14 cfs. If an outflow of 63 cfs from Vadnais Lake is necessary, the flow should be <br />diverted around Twin Lake. This would protect Twin Lake's water quality, and would also reduce the <br />potential for r'looding. A route for such flow is suggested, through wetlands west of Twin. Lake, under <br />Interstate 694, and into the County Ditch 16 system. Further study of this route is necessary. <br />Based on apparent low house floor elevations, a reasonable flood elevation for Twin Lake is <br />875 feat. <br />Assuming that outflow from Vadnais Lake does not flow through Twin Lake, Twin Lake should <br />rarely, if ever, reach. this flood stage. Historic levels for Twin Lake range from Elevation 866.6 to 869. <br />Hydrologic modeling of the watershed estimates the flood level to be 875.1 feet after the critical runoff <br />event (the 100-year, 30-day snowmelt), even assuming a maximum allowable beginning water level of <br />870.7 feet. Without any improvements, lake levels should be monitored and kept at or below <br />Elevation 870.5. If a 36-inch culvert with a flap gate at Elevation 872.3 is installed upstream of I-694, <br />the maximum allowable beginning water level could be as high as Elevation 873.9. The one-way flap <br />gate would serve the purpose of protecting the water quality of Twin Lake from the freeway runoff. <br />The proposed culvert through the dike at I-694 should be planned, but actual construction could <br />he deferred until Twin Lake rose to its action level of 870.5.. At that time, pumping or culvert <br />construction could be selected as a management technique. <br />23\6212641TWIl~ILAICE.RPT\KMH 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.