My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-08-14_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
2003-08-14_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2010 8:25:50 AM
Creation date
4/15/2010 8:14:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/14/2003
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
will be necessary. These measures might include a program of public education for the residents of the <br />Twin Lake watershed. The program would include educational .briefings and pamphlets alerting the <br />residents to be mindful of what is allowed to enter the storm sewer systems and the Iake, and would help <br />discourage harmful Iawn care practices. <br />6.0 MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES AND RELATIVE COSTS <br />Management alternatives for Twin Lake are dependent on whether Vadnais Lake is allowed to <br />overflow to Twin Lake. Alternatives without and with. overflow are discussed below. <br />~ If it can be determined that Twin Lake will not be required to accommodate any flows <br />from the neighboring Vadnais watershed, management considerations are sirnpIified. The <br />lake would still need to be managed to stay below flood levels, and the water quality of <br />the lake would need to be preserved. Lake management would likely take one of two <br />forms. <br />1. The preferred method would require installing a culvert through the dike currently <br />guarding the entrance to the culvert under I-694. The culvert would allow increased <br />capacity for Twin Lake at lower elevations. To avoid adverse water quality <br />impacts, the culvert should have a flap gate which allows flow only from Twin <br />Lake and to the I-b94 culverts. This alternative would provide additional capacity <br />for outflow during large storm events, but would serve to maintain the lake's <br />isolation from the interstate runoff. Hydraulic and hydrologic considerations for <br />this alternative were discussed above; the arrangement would prevent flooding even <br />if the water Level before the rainfall or snowmelt event were right at the level of the <br />outlet. This system is estimated to cost about $13,000 and would not require <br />pumping to control water levels. Construction could be deferred until a need is <br />demonstrated by the lake level rising to the maximum beginning {action) level of <br />870.5. <br />2. If no culvert improvements are made, the lake must be monitored for dangerously <br />high pre-snowmelt or mid-summer water levels. If in the early spring, the lake <br />level were above 870.5 feet, and large accumulations of snow were present, <br />pumping (presumably into Vadnais) could be done to lower the lake and eliminate <br />the possibility of flooding. Similarly, if mid-summer levels exceeded 870.5 feet, <br />pumping could be performed to avoid flooding from large rainfall events. No <br />23162~264\TWINLAKE.RP'I'~KMIi 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.