Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX <br />E EFIT.~a ~f ~E~ and Fi~®~PLA~tV ~'dAP~ <br />A statewide high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) would provide critical information to <br />create current and accurate floodplain maps that would benefit Minnesota, but would also benefit <br />other activities of government and the private sector. This appendix is intended to document the <br />extent of those two beneflts.I <br />The State of North Carolina has suffered from flooding, mostly due to hurricanes, and conducted <br />an intensive benefit/cost study to estimate the value of having good floodplain maps. They <br />concluded that "for every dollar spent on mapping, the payback is $3.50?" Part of the reason for <br />this high ratio of benefit to cost is the relatively low cost of new LIDAR technology. Compared to <br />traditional methods of collecting elevation data, LIDAR is 30-50 percent cheaper. <br />North Carolina experiences annual flood damages of $56 million. Minnesota averaged a whopping <br />$90 million annually in expenses reimbursed by state and federal agencies in the 1990's. Flooding <br />in Minnesota during 1997 alone caused an estimated $1.5 billion in damages. The damages would <br />have been worse were it not for the permanent flood control structures in place, the measures taken <br />in advance of the floods and the emergency measures taken during the floods. Significant flood <br />damages were inflicted on the Cities of East Grand Forks, Ada and Breckenridge, but over 40 <br />communities were spared by preventive actions. Better floodplain maps would have reduced that <br />damage even further by helping communities manage their floodplains before the floods and by <br />directing mitigation efforts during the events. <br />Local governments currently are trying to make decisions about flood events, decisions that could <br />be much easier with current and accurate floodplain maps. These decisions could save lives and <br />money, but officials are flying blind. For example, the City of East Grand Forks gets roughly 300 <br />building permit applications per year and is struggling with old floodplain maps and less than <br />optimal elevation data as it tries to make decisions about whether or not to approve them. <br />Meanwhile, the city gets over 500 calls a year from banks and others about whether buildings are <br />in or out of the floodplain. In the Roseau County, which recently suffered flood damage to some <br />1500 homes, local officials are trying to reduce future damage by planning projects that include <br />levees, bypass channels, and upstream divisions -projects that can be planned well only with better <br />floodplain and DEM data. <br />' A number of people provided key information reported in this appendix. They include: <br />Ann Banitt, Hydraulic Engineer, US Army Corps of Engineers; Jay Bell, Professor of Soil, Water and Climate, University of <br />Minnesota; Jeff Grosso, Surveyor, City of Saint Paul; Tom Lutgen, Floodplain Program Hydrologist, Waters Division, Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources; Larry Nybeck, Deputy Director/County Surveyor, Survey and Land Management Division, <br />Washington County; and Lisa Sayler, Hydraulics Automation Engineer, Minnesota Department of Transportation. <br />- Smith, Brandon R. 2002. Floodplain Fliers: North Carolina's Massive LIDAR Project, GeoSpatial Solcctions, February, 28-33. <br />